> On Dec 20, 2019, at 5:25 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
>
>
> What I'm saying is highway=bundesstraße could be acceptable, but
> straße=bundestraße wouldn't be. Mostly so way type objects with highway=*
> are still potentially routable.
I sure wouldn’t want to be the person in charge of
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 7:22 PM Jarek Piórkowski
wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 at 20:16, Paul Johnson wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 6:57 PM Joseph Eisenberg <
> joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Being able to speak each country's highway lingua franca would make
> it a lot easier
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 7:18 PM Clifford Snow
wrote:
> I've reached out to a couple of the nearby reservations, one with a small
> parcel of off reservation land trust, the other with only a small
> reservation but a very large off reservation land trust. I don't expect
> answers until possibly
(Conversational quoting, please)
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 6:42 PM David Bartecchi
wrote:
> All of these concerns must be weighed against the fact that the current
> absence of Native lands in OSM only contributes to the erasure Native
> Americans and their lands from the American collective
I've reached out to a couple of the nearby reservations, one with a small
parcel of off reservation land trust, the other with only a small
reservation but a very large off reservation land trust. I don't expect
answers until possibly after the new year. Unlike Oklahoma, Washington
reservations
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 6:57 PM Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
> > Being able to speak each country's highway lingua franca would make it a
> lot easier for OSM to become the Rosetta Stone of maps simply from ease of
> classification.
>
> That would mean using "jalan=provinsi" instead of
> Being able to speak each country's highway lingua franca would make it a lot
> easier for OSM to become the Rosetta Stone of maps simply from ease of
> classification.
That would mean using "jalan=provinsi" instead of "highway=primary" in
Indonesia, so any global map service (like
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 1:07 AM Mateusz Konieczny
wrote:
>
> 20 Dec 2019, 01:25 by ba...@ursamundi.org:
>
> So, for example, in the US, instead of motorway, trunk, primary,
> secondary, tertiary, perhaps something more like freeway, expressway,
> major/minor_principal (just having this would fix
Content warning: Aboriginal abuse mention
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 2:08 PM Clifford Snow
wrote:
> I do have Washington State tribal lands available [1] as a background
> layer for JOSM. There is also a vector tile layer [2] of the same
> background available for iD users.
>
> The data contains
Above it was said that the highway=trunk vs highway=primary
distinction is mostly for routing applications. But allowing a proper
rendering is also a main goal of the road tagging system.
While it's true that road class is useful for routing when there are
two alterate routes, a main reason to
Eric H. Christensen wrote:
> The routing engine should be able to take into account
> the road surface
It can and often does. Your problem there is that only 2% of highway= ways
in the US are explicitly tagged with surface; probably only 30% are
implicitly tagged; and sometimes the implicit
11 matches
Mail list logo
