Am 26.07.2013 um 14:17 schrieb Mike Thompson :
> I haven't seen sac_scale used on an area, but it seems reasonable
-1, it is clearly thought and defined for (osm-)highways and not for an area.
There are usually several possibilities where to cross an area, especially if
you include difficult
Am 12.06.2013 um 06:21 schrieb Serge Wroclawski :
> Your reply really doesn't address what William is saying, which is
> that neighbourhood boundaries are subjective. I think we all agree
> that neighbourhoods are useful, but they're worse than political
> boundaries in terms of being unsurveyab
Am 12.06.2013 um 03:06 schrieb Clifford Snow :
> One reason for including boundaries is querying to determine what exists in a
> neighborhood. Another is to see the result from a search using nominatim. A
> single node doesn't really tell much of a story, while a boundary give a
> better scop
Am 05.06.2013 um 19:20 schrieb Frederik Ramm :
> The usual OSM approach would be that if a route is signposted, then it can be
> mapped - if not, then not.
Somehow the on-the-ground rule was extended to include what is verifiable on
paper as well. See administrative borders for instance, the
Am 25/mag/2013 um 12:22 schrieb Paweł Paprota :
> Sure but have you ever seen a link to OSM object (way/relation/node) in the
> internet?
Yes, I noted this because of a misspelled street name, but it also works for
correctly spelled ones, if you put osm to the search term you'll see them
so
5 matches
Mail list logo
