> What would be saved by dropping the nameless intermittent streams assuming
> they were simplified?
I expect this really varies by location. In my area (Washington County, Oregon)
these streams were quite useless. Most of them were just plain gone, replaced
by farm fields or suburban housing
> From: Jaakko Helleranta.com [mailto:jaa...@helleranta.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 5:52 AM
> To: Paul Norman
> Subject: Re: [Imports] What to do with unnamed NHD streams
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> Where can I get my hands on this data / its documentation?
>
> I'm actually most interested about
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 8:51 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
> Background: I'm working on converting NHD to .osm format
>
> NHD is an extremely large data set. It's about 25G of zipfiles and all of
> this converted to .osm would total about 3 TB. This is about 10x-15x times
> the size of planet.osm.
>
> T
3 matches
Mail list logo
