Re: [Talk-us] [Warning: Potential Flamewar] Clarifying Interstate Relations

2010-03-12 Thread Paul Johnson
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 05:16:44 -0500, Nathan Edgars II wrote: Paul Johnson wrote: On Sun, 07 Feb 2010 13:58:38 -0500, Chris Hunter wrote: NE2 has been making a number of questionable edits in the northwest Oregon area recently; I wonder if it's possible to smack 'em upside the head with a

Re: [Talk-us] [Warning: Potential Flamewar] Clarifying Interstate Relations

2010-02-08 Thread Matthias Julius
Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us writes: What's more annoying is that he is changing the names/refs. From what I understand the ref is supposed to be only the interstate/highway number (e.g. 90 or 80) and not I 90 (MN). And I don't like this at all. First, this seems to be different than how

Re: [Talk-us] [Warning: Potential Flamewar] Clarifying Interstate Relations

2010-02-08 Thread Jeffrey Ollie
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Matthias Julius li...@julius-net.net wrote: Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us writes: What's more annoying is that he is changing the names/refs.   From what I understand the ref is supposed to be only the interstate/highway number (e.g. 90 or 80) and not I 90

Re: [Talk-us] [Warning: Potential Flamewar] Clarifying Interstate Relations

2010-02-08 Thread Matthias Julius
Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us writes: On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 1:13 PM, Matthias Julius li...@julius-net.net wrote: Jeffrey Ollie j...@ocjtech.us writes: What's more annoying is that he is changing the names/refs.   From what I understand the ref is supposed to be only the interstate/highway

[Talk-us] [Warning: Potential Flamewar] Clarifying Interstate Relations

2010-02-07 Thread Chris Hunter
According to the WIKI and some discussions back in April ( http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2009-April/000976.html) and again in September ( http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2009-September/001597.html), the US Interstate system was going to be moved into a new

Re: [Talk-us] [Warning: Potential Flamewar] Clarifying Interstate Relations

2010-02-07 Thread Richard Welty
On 2/7/10 1:58 PM, Chris Hunter wrote: According to the WIKI and some discussions back in April (http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2009-April/000976.html) and again in September (http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2009-September/001597.html), the US Interstate

Re: [Talk-us] [Warning: Potential Flamewar] Clarifying Interstate Relations

2010-02-07 Thread Dave Hansen
On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 14:42 -0500, Richard Welty wrote: i concur with the notion of splitting at state lines. i also think that the longer US routes need to be handled in a similar manner. Yeah, that's sane. If for no other reason than the fact that the mile markers reset at state lines. I

Re: [Talk-us] [Warning: Potential Flamewar] Clarifying Interstate Relations

2010-02-07 Thread Jeffrey Ollie
On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Chris Hunter chunter...@gmail.com wrote: Last night, user NE2 cleaned up the interstate system by merging all of the states with 2 relations per interstate back into 1 relation with direction-based roles.  I've already requested a roll-back on the area I was

Re: [Talk-us] [Warning: Potential Flamewar] Clarifying Interstate Relations

2010-02-07 Thread Chris Hunter
Oh, and yes I did contact them via both the OSM Messaging system and the WIKI's messaging system. On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 12:19 AM, Chris Hunter chunter...@gmail.com wrote: I don't think NE2 is on any of these mailing lists. Can someone put a temporary ban on their account? They've been