Based on suggestions in an earlier thread, I have begun the task of
analyzing the errors in the existing data for the islands of Hawaii and
other US Pacific Islands. I have begun with a few of the smaller, simpler
islands, and I'd like to start sharing my findings.
Kohoʻolawe:
This is an
Lehua:
This is a tiny, uninhabited islet off the coast of Niʻihau. The shoreline
data could use some cleanup, but it is roughly correct. The boundary data
seems to come from the same low resolution source, but the 1km east
displacement error seems to have been manually corrected.
Molokini:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Scott Atwood scott.roy.atw...@gmail.com wrote:
Once again, if the political boundaries are supposed to correspond exactly
to the shoreline data, the whatever is done for Kohoʻolawe and Lanaʻi should
also be done for these three islands to correct the political
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Scott Atwood scott.roy.atw...@gmail.com
wrote:
Once again, if the political boundaries are supposed to correspond
exactly
to the shoreline data, the whatever is done for Kohoʻolawe and
I'm completely unfamiliar with the process of importing TIGER data. Is it
possible to import only a subset of the TIGER data, such as that
corresponding to the county/state/US boundaries at 3 miles? Can we verify
that the 2008 TIGER data has the correct geodetic datum for Hawaiʻi? And if
both
5 matches
Mail list logo
