Steve Friedl writes:
> I'm mapping mostly in Southern California where I live and hike, and
> sometimes I run across nodes with no tags, not part of anything, often the
> owned by some kind of bot.
Chances are very good that they are leftovers from an edit that
someone made who chose not to agr
On 12/7/2015 8:39 PM, Steve Friedl wrote:
Most of them are by bots – OSMF Redaction Account, woodpeck_fixbot – and
they appear to be spurious, but I’m not sure if they are there for a
reason.
Is there ever any benefit in a standalone node with no tags, especially
if it doesn’t appear to be in an
Ive found a bunch in Phoenix Arizona also
On Dec 7, 2015 6:46 PM, "Paul Fox" wrote:
> steve wrote:
> > Is there ever any benefit in a standalone node with no tags, especially
> if
> > it doesn't appear to be in an "interesting" location relative to
> underlying
> > imagery?
>
> corollary: is
steve wrote:
> Is there ever any benefit in a standalone node with no tags, especially if
> it doesn't appear to be in an "interesting" location relative to underlying
> imagery?
corollary: is there ever any benefit in a standalone way (not in a
relation) with no tags? i've come across those
Hello all,
I'm mapping mostly in Southern California where I live and hike, and
sometimes I run across nodes with no tags, not part of anything, often the
owned by some kind of bot. You can't see them directly in OSM, but in JOSM
there's a trail of them paralleling Santiago Truck Trail:
ht
5 matches
Mail list logo