Found in Albany this morning:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nfgusedautoparts/8229572497/
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Yes, in that the carriageways are effectively separated. But in a very
tortured sort of way.
-- SEJ
-- twitter: @geomantic
-- skype: sejohnson8
Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen. --
Einstein
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Richard Welty
On 11/29/12 1:48 PM, Steven Johnson wrote:
Yes, in that the carriageways are effectively separated. But in a very
tortured sort of way.
from looking at bing imagery, it looks like they tore out a badly
deteriorated
section between the two carriageways.
richard
It looks like there were a few points where there were garden dividers,
but that changed after a repaving.
From looking around on OSM, it doesn't seem like people are marking roads
with a garden in the middle of the road as a dual carriageway, maybe they
should be?
Bing Maps:
On 11/29/12 2:18 PM, Jim McAndrew wrote:
It looks like there were a few points where there were garden dividers,
but that changed after a repaving.
From looking around on OSM, it doesn't seem like people are marking roads
with a garden in the middle of the road as a dual carriageway, maybe they
* Jim McAndrew j...@loc8.us [2012-11-29 12:18 -0700]:
From looking around on OSM, it doesn't seem like people are marking roads
with a garden in the middle of the road as a dual carriageway, maybe they
should be?
For short islands in the middle of a road (like the links you gave), I
usually
On 11/29/2012 2:18 PM, Jim McAndrew wrote:
From looking around on OSM, it doesn't seem like people are marking
roads with a garden in the middle of the road as a dual carriageway,
maybe they should be?
I do this is if there is a 'significant impact' on routing
(subjective, I know). Some
7 matches
Mail list logo
