[Talk-us] Duplicate TIGER imports

2009-04-14 Thread Minh Nguyen
A few weeks after DaveHansen imported the TIGER data for Ohio [1], RSatterf reimported the data for Greene County, Ohio [2]. As a result, every single way in the county is duplicated. On top of that, RSatterf's import also added a loose node (not connected to any way) for every node of every

Re: [Talk-us] Duplicate TIGER imports

2009-04-14 Thread Dave Hansen
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 15:41 -0700, Minh Nguyen wrote: A few weeks after DaveHansen imported the TIGER data for Ohio [1], RSatterf reimported the data for Greene County, Ohio [2]. As a result, every single way in the county is duplicated. On top of that, RSatterf's import also added a loose

Re: [Talk-us] Duplicate TIGER imports

2009-04-14 Thread Chris Lawrence
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Minh Nguyen m...@1ec5.org wrote: A few weeks after DaveHansen imported the TIGER data for Ohio [1], RSatterf reimported the data for Greene County, Ohio [2]. As a result, every single way in the county is duplicated. On top of that, RSatterf's import also added

Re: [Talk-us] Duplicate TIGER imports

2009-04-14 Thread Dave Hansen
On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 19:22 -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote: On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Minh Nguyen m...@1ec5.org wrote: A few weeks after DaveHansen imported the TIGER data for Ohio [1], RSatterf reimported the data for Greene County, Ohio [2]. As a result, every single way in the county

Re: [Talk-us] Duplicate TIGER imports

2009-04-14 Thread Minh Nguyen
On 4/14/09 5:25 PM, Dave Hansen wrote: On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 19:22 -0500, Chris Lawrence wrote: On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Minh Nguyenm...@1ec5.org wrote: A few weeks after DaveHansen imported the TIGER data for Ohio [1], RSatterf reimported the data for Greene County, Ohio