Re: [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

This is all good information and it should be in OSM. I'm just saying it doesn't need to be in there twice. > On Sep 2, 2016, at 3:47 PM, Jack Burke wrote: > > Tagging maxspeed is purely for a router. So are turn restrictions > As for turn:lanes meant for complex

Re: [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

Tagging maxspeed is purely for a router. So are turn restrictions. As for turn:lanes meant for complex intersectionsthe examples in the wiki show very simple uses. I can't see anything in it, or the discussion page, indicating that it is only for complex intersections. Certainly there is a

Re: [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 12:18 PM, David Mease wrote: > I thing my reservations about this type of tagging is that this may be > "tagging for the router". > On some level, all of it is. > I still view the turn:lanes scheme as a (probably incomplete) way of > describing

Re: [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

I thing my reservations about this type of tagging is that this may be "tagging for the router". I still view the turn:lanes scheme as a (probably incomplete) way of describing complex intersections. Tagging simple intersections with this scheme just to get a routing engine to display the

Re: [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

Would love to compare notes on that, but it'll have to be later next week. If you want to look at what I do for exits, feel free to examine pretty much all of them on I 75 south of Atlanta, as well as through downtown. --jack On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 4:25 PM, Paul Johnson

Re: [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Jack Burke wrote: > > This exit has no turn lane. There is no staging lane prior to the exit > where tags could be placed, one should not be created just so that there is > a place to put tags. > > This freeway should not be split. You said

Re: [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

I've given it a little minor tag-completion update if anybody wants to compare notes. On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 11:00 AM, Duane Gearhart wrote: > FYI - the exit 78 interchange information has been updated. The Mapzen > directions are calling out the exit as you expected >

Re: [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

> This exit has no turn lane. There is no staging lane prior to the exit where tags could be placed, one should not be created just so that there is a place to put tags. > This freeway should not be split. You said yourself that the exit is not part of the freeway itself, so tags should not be

Re: [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

So it sounds like the general consensus is that I should probably be using "through;right" at places like shown in my original pic, instead of "none;right", based on the usage rather than the signage (presuming, of course, my tagging doesn't conflict with a sign, which shouldn't happen since

Re: [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

Where I live (San Francisco, CA, USA), lane arrows are generally added for one of two reasons: 1) It isn't obvious what the authorized use of a lane is, when there is e.g. a right, slight right, and through option with various lanes for each - especially when there are multiple slight_rights as

Re: [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:06 PM, David Mease wrote: > Road markings are both beneficial and useful for navigation. Cities and > governments have paid a lot of money installing them all over globe > precisely for these reasons. OSM would be well served to include them >

Re: [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 4:28 PM, Rihards wrote: > On 2016.08.26. 00:15, Jack Burke wrote: > >> Freeway exit tagging >> >> >> I am totally confused. >> >> What is the proper method to use turn:lanes to tag freeway lanes >> approaching an exit, where the exit branches directly

Re: [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

> mapping the road markings seems extremely strange - what if they are very > faded, when do we map them ? is there a threshold of % of the paint left ? > what is there are no road markings but there are signs ? I encouraged MapBox to add some of their workflow information to the wiki page.[1]

Re: [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

My interpretation: What is the proper method to use turn:lanes to tag freeway lanes >> approaching an exit, where the exit branches directly from an edge lane >> without being part of the freeway itself, but the freeway lanes are not >> signed with an arrow, such as this one? >>

Re: [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

On 2016.08.26. 00:15, Jack Burke wrote: Freeway exit tagging I am totally confused. What is the proper method to use turn:lanes to tag freeway lanes approaching an exit, where the exit branches directly from an edge lane without being part of the freeway itself, but the freeway lanes are not

[Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

Freeway exit tagging I am totally confused. What is the proper method to use turn:lanes to tag freeway lanes approaching an exit, where the exit branches directly from an edge lane without being part of the freeway itself, but the freeway lanes are not signed with an arrow, such as this one?