The MassGIS import included a condition tag:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/9602415
Presumably this is something in their data, but what use is it to us?
There's no definition of what 'intolerable' means, and no way to know
what value to use if the road is repaved.
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com writes:
The MassGIS import included a condition tag:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/9602415
Presumably this is something in their data, but what use is it to us?
There's no definition of what 'intolerable' means, and no way to know
what value to
On 7/15/2011 8:15 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
Nathan Edgars IInerou...@gmail.com writes:
The MassGIS import included a condition tag:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/9602415
Presumably this is something in their data, but what use is it to us?
There's no definition of what 'intolerable'
Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com writes:
On 7/15/2011 8:15 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
Nathan Edgars IInerou...@gmail.com writes:
The MassGIS import included a condition tag:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/9602415
Presumably this is something in their data, but what use is it to
On 7/15/2011 9:13 PM, Greg Troxel wrote:
I would say that if you know a road has been repaved, you might set it
to 'good' or whatever the appropriate value is.
This has pointers to the mass spec, I think:
http://www.mass.gov/mgis/eotroads.htm
According to the linked PDF, the field measures
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
By that logic all tags should have dates. Perhaps a fair point, but not
where tagging is.
On manually mapped data, the tag is known to be accurate as of the day
it was added to the way and can be viewed in the way history.
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 9:13 PM, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:
I usually think that OSM needs to adopt terms/standards of existing
professional communities rather than make up our own. I am not clear
on road condition standards, but clearly various government road
maintenance bodies
7 matches
Mail list logo
