I'm wondering if anyone has any experience with the National Wetlands
Inventory: http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/
At first glance it looks like better-quality data than the NHD for
both wetlands and water.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
I'm not an expert on either of these data sets, but I know enough to say
that USGS sponsored the development of the NHD, largely to replace the old
digital line graph (DLG) products. NHD serves as a multi-purpose inventory
of surface waters, grouped by watershed. OTOH, FWS sponsored development of
Hmm. It sounds like we want the routability of the NHD reach-code system
with the accuracy and completeness of the Wetland Inventory.
I wonder if there's some gotcha in the FWS dataset that would make it
inappropriate to use. For example, I see a lot of freshwater areas that are
really
It's been my experience way back when in a past life that the Wetlands
Inventory (while busier and therefore appears to have more data) really
wasn't all that great spatially. We would use it for a reference for
mapping - as in there should be a wetland here and then interpret the
correct
4 matches
Mail list logo