On Mar 22, 2011, at 9:17 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
This is now complete for the area west of Portland Oregon as a test.
http://www.paulnorman.ca/blog/?attachment_id=96 shows the difference.
Nice improvement! I like it.
About 99.8% of the data was untouched since it was imported. I checked the
]
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2011 6:52 PM
To: 'Richard Welty'; talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Proposed cleanup: NHD rivers
This is the view I subscribe to too. An example of two ways I would want
to join would be http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/68711710 and
http
[mailto:jcha...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 3:48 PM
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Proposed cleanup: NHD rivers
I know of least one 46006 that I would consider a river (Tussahaw
creek) , but doesn't have river in the name, but as bad as other NHD
data I've
A mapnik rendering change has revealed a problem in some areas with NHD
imported waterways. An example of the problem is at
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.3lon=-123.3zoom=9layers=M
Essentially, all the streams are tagged as waterway=river, with
waterway=stream being used for what appear to
were, in fact,
all intermittent.
---Original Email---
Subject :[Talk-us] Proposed cleanup: NHD rivers
From :mailto:penor...@mac.com
Date :Sun Mar 20 16:29:54 America/Chicago 2011
A mapnik rendering change has revealed a problem in some areas with NHD
imported waterways. An example
...@jfeldredge.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2011 2:42 PM
To: OpenStreetMap talk-us list
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Proposed cleanup: NHD rivers
Has anyone determined for sure that the streams you plan to tag as
intermittent are so, in fact? This would require either getting
confirmation from
1 and 2 make sense to me. What criteria would you use for 2? I have
done a fair bit of NHD imports and simply used the name, i.e. river,
to classify rivers. Some parts of the country have different naming
traditions that others.
What is the rationale for 3?
On Sunday, March 20,
] Proposed cleanup: NHD rivers
1 and 2 make sense to me. What criteria would you use for 2? I have
done a fair bit of NHD imports and simply used the name, i.e.
river, to classify rivers. Some parts of the country have different
naming traditions that others.
What is the rationale for 3
On 3/20/11 7:50 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
3 is about making the rivers into single ways, more like a mapper would do
by hand. I'm not really set on this step and if done it would be after steps
1 and 2 have been done everywhere. Looking at nhd:com_id it might cause
problems with updating, so I'm
On 3/20/2011 8:13 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
On 3/20/11 7:50 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
3 is about making the rivers into single ways, more like a mapper
would do
by hand. I'm not really set on this step and if done it would be after
steps
1 and 2 have been done everywhere. Looking at nhd:com_id it
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.netwrote:
On 3/20/11 7:50 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
3 is about making the rivers into single ways, more like a mapper would
do
by hand. I'm not really set on
On 3/20/2011 8:18 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
There were several clients that did not attempt to connect the ways of
each NHD linestring so there are duplicated nodes and ways that touch
but aren't joined. Hopefully fixing this is what Paul was talking about.
Agreed - this is a safe case of
On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Mike N nice...@att.net wrote:
On 3/20/2011 8:18 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
There were several clients that did not attempt to connect the ways of
each NHD linestring so there are duplicated nodes and ways that touch
but aren't joined. Hopefully fixing this is what
On 3/20/2011 9:12 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
if combining them meaningfully improves the map, by all means do it.
Or improves editing.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Message-
From: Richard Welty [mailto:rwe...@averillpark.net]
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2011 5:38 PM
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Proposed cleanup: NHD rivers
On 3/20/11 8:16 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 3/20/2011 8:13 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
d suggest using
15 matches
Mail list logo
