From: stevea [mailto:stevea...@softworkers.com]
Sent: Monday, October 07, 2013 10:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] TIGER 2013 Places shapefile for PA?
Now, is there a method (as neat and easy as using itoworld) that renders
both ways and relations? I mean for admin_levels, especially
On 10/8/13 2:53 AM, Paul Norman wrote:
I'd say the biggest problem is ways that almost overlap and should be
shared, but don't
what i'm seeing in the northeast is that county boundaries were brought
in from a USGS
data set that wasn't particularly accurate, and many places (cities,
villages,
i know that probably nobody has a copy of this but when i went to
grab it from the census bureau website this morning i was reminded
that USGov is mostly shut down right now.
so does anyone have a copy of the 2013 zip file or shape file for
places (villages, hamlets, cdps) in Pennsylvania they
I don't have 2013, but I do have 2012 place files here:
https://census-backup.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html
You might try poking around Mike Migurski's collection too:
http://forever.codeforamerica.org/Census-API/shutdown-2013.html
On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 8:14 AM, Richard Welty
On 10/7/13 9:17 AM, Ian Dees wrote:
I don't have 2013, but I do have 2012 place files here:
https://census-backup.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html
You might try poking around Mike Migurski's collection too:
http://forever.codeforamerica.org/Census-API/shutdown-2013.html
thanks. it turns out
On 10/7/13 9:46 AM, Richard Welty wrote:
ks. it turns out that all the by-state places shapefiles (and from
the looks of it, nearly all if not all of the others) are in Mike's
collection.
actually, it's missing county subdivisions, but i don't need that, just
the places file. i have 2013 county
On 10/7/13 1:22 PM, Michal Migurski wrote:
On Oct 7, 2013, at 6:46 AM, Richard Welty wrote:
On 10/7/13 9:17 AM, Ian Dees wrote:
I don't have 2013, but I do have 2012 place files here:
https://census-backup.s3.amazonaws.com/index.html
You might try poking around Mike Migurski's collection
This reminds me of how patchy old USA looks when viewed with
itoworld's admin_level render
http://www.itoworld.com/map/2?lon=-95lat=37zoom=5fullscreen=true
especially at county level (admin_level=6 orange). Some states are
snap-sharp beautiful (Michigan, Dakotas, Carolinas, New Mexico), some
That ITO map seems to be only looking at ways. If you include relations in
the analysis things should actually be pretty good. There should be a
(mostly) correct boundary relation for every county in the US. At one point
I was the last user to have touched about 40% of them... There may very
well
Toby, thank you very much for that clarification. I see the ito
admin map does not respect relations at the city level but couldn't
really prove it and/or got befuddled at the county level. Seeing the
itoworld rendering at the California/Arizona/Mexico border really
stymied me until I
10 matches
Mail list logo
