Re: [Talk-us] Talk-us Digest, Vol 102, Issue 13

2016-05-09 Thread Mike Thompson
On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 2:45 PM, OSM Volunteer stevea < stevea...@softworkers.com> wrote: > On 8/19/2015 2:29 AM, Nathan Mixter wrote: > > I would like to see areas in OSM categorized as either land use, land > cover (which we call natural for the most part in OSM) or administrative to > clear the

Re: [Talk-us] Talk-us Digest, Vol 102, Issue 13

2016-05-09 Thread OSM Volunteer stevea
> On 8/19/2015 2:29 AM, Nathan Mixter wrote: >> I would like to see areas in OSM categorized as either land use, land cover >> (which we call natural for the most part in OSM) or administrative to clear >> the confusion. I am also in favor of eliminating the landuse=forest tag at >> least in its