Even before April Fools:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/10842511
I love how portions of US 2, US 83, and US 95 are now in Canada.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.562lon=-112.387zoom=11layers=M
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.812lon=-101.089zoom=11layers=M
Add I-15 to that list as well as not being in Canada.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.3441lon=-111.9452zoom=13layers=M
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Hi,
On 03/11/2012 10:58 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Even before April Fools:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/10842511
I love how portions of US 2, US 83, and US 95 are now in Canada.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.562lon=-112.387zoom=11layers=M
Subject: [Talk-us] The vandalism has begun
Even before April Fools:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/10842511
I love how portions of US 2, US 83, and US 95 are now in Canada.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.562lon=-112.387zoom=11layers=M
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat
On 3/11/2012 6:35 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
On 03/11/2012 10:58 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Even before April Fools:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/10842511
I love how portions of US 2, US 83, and US 95 are now in Canada.
Can someone please revert changeset 10842511? It's too big for JOSM's
reverter plugin.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
I looked at the .CA lists and couldn't tell if this was due to removing
data that isn't even CC-SA compliant, or making it easier to get a jump
start on remapping. If the purpose is to make remapping easier, I
think it is disrespectful of data consumers. Data consumers are aware
of the 1
On Mar 11, 2012, at 4:17 PM, Mike N wrote:
I looked at the .CA lists and couldn't tell if this was due to removing data
that isn't even CC-SA compliant, or making it easier to get a jump start on
remapping. If the purpose is to make remapping easier, I think it is
disrespectful of data
8 matches
Mail list logo