On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 11:07 AM, Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 16:29 -0700, Alan Brown wrote:
When that data is imported - how will you know that a missing road was
intentionally deleted from OSM, or simply missing from the dataset?
If they reappear, it
I don't see it as corrupting. It's not mangling the mapper's work in any
way. If they don't like the new overlapping road, then just delete the TIGER
one.
Ok - We've hit an impass then.
You can't just hit delete You have to merge all the duplicated data in
order
to make the way/area sane It
PM
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Tiger Data 2007
I don't see it as corrupting. It's not mangling the mapper's work in any
way. If they don't like the new overlapping road, then just delete the TIGER
one.
Ok - We've hit an impass then.
You can't just hit delete You have to merge all the duplicated data
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 15:46 -0700, Alan Brown wrote:
If those 10% are located where someone has poured their heart into
making a carefully constructed map - you could disillusion some of
your most active contributors.
Yup, I completely agree.
But, one of the nice things is that the active
4 matches
Mail list logo
