On 21/lug/2013, at 22:26, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
If it has more than an exceptionally rare at-grade junction, it should be a
trunk. If it's not divided, it should be a trunk even if it doesn't have
at-grade junctions.
for what it's worth, in Germany and Italy we use
On Jul 22, 2013 2:42 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 21/lug/2013, at 22:26, Paul Johnson ba...@ursamundi.org wrote:
If it has more than an exceptionally rare at-grade junction, it should
be a trunk. If it's not divided, it should be a trunk even if it doesn't
have
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 11:58 PM, Shawn K. Quinn skqu...@rushpost.comwrote:
I noticed that most of these were recently changed back to motorway. Is
this the consensus of the community at large that these should be
motorway, or should any section with grade crossings be trunk?
I'm slightly in
I remember this specific issue being brought up multiple times before. It's
been my understanding that this is the consensus: the pieces of I-10 and
I-40 in West Texas should be trunk wherever they have at-grade
intersections, because they have multiple at-grade intersections and not a
single rare
As an example of what I am referring to:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/145137749/history
I noticed that most of these were recently changed back to motorway. Is
this the consensus of the community at large that these should be
motorway, or should any section with grade crossings be
From: Shawn K. Quinn [mailto:skqu...@rushpost.com]
Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 9:59 PM
Subject: [Talk-us] Trunk vs motorway for rural Interstates with grade
crossings
As an example of what I am referring to:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/145137749/history
I noticed
6 matches
Mail list logo
