Re: [Talk-us] US-Mexico border precision

2010-12-17 Thread Paul Johnson
On 12/17/2010 12:47 AM, Alan Mintz wrote: At 2010-12-16 19:39, Paul Johnson wrote: You'd think, but then you have Needles, Arizona, which California keeps trying to claim. OK, I'll take the bait. Huh? Needles has been in a three-way dispute with Nevada, Arizona and California over which

Re: [Talk-us] US-Mexico border precision

2010-12-17 Thread Andrew S. J. Sawyer
The Neddles dispute is not too much different from the dispute NH and Maine had over their boundary stretching from the Piscataqua River to the Isles of Shoals. Mainly it was over whether Seavy Island (Portsmouth Naval Shipyard) belonged to NH or ME. The Supreme Court of the US ruled in two cases

Re: [Talk-us] US-Mexico border precision

2010-12-17 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Andrew S. J. Sawyer assaw...@gmail.com wrote: Tying back to the US-Mexico boundary it would make sense to obtain the highest-resolution boundary from each side and tag according to above. I don't like boundary clutter but we should be able/try to differentiate

Re: [Talk-us] US-Mexico border precision

2010-12-16 Thread Alan Mintz
At 2010-12-14 17:52, Nathan Edgars II wrote: ... One likely error is at http://mapper.acme.com/?ll=25.93454,-97.56975z=15t=T where TIGER follows the existing import rather than the Rio Grande (Google seems to have used the same import and has the same probable error), so I'll add a FIXME tag to

Re: [Talk-us] US-Mexico border precision

2010-12-16 Thread Anthony
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Alan Mintz alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote: Country and state borders are pretty carefully defined by law and treaties, and it's unlikely that an individual user is more correct than a current government-sourced dataset. The government has an obvious

Re: [Talk-us] US-Mexico border precision

2010-12-14 Thread Nathan Edgars II
Since nobody's suggested anything better, I'm going to import the Texas-Mexico border from TIGER. It's not necessarily perfect (judging by other TIGER boundaries, though I couldn't find any obvious issues here), but at least it doesn't put part of Matamoros in the US. On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 2:44

Re: [Talk-us] US-Mexico border precision

2010-12-14 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Adam Schreiber adam.schrei...@gmail.com wrote: If I'm in the history of the border, I originally uploaded the border from TIGER. I can't tell definitely who originally uploaded it due to merging of ways, but it appears to have been created here:

Re: [Talk-us] US-Mexico border precision

2010-12-14 Thread Nathan Edgars II
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 8:53 PM, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote: Can you please follow the import guidelines? Which TIGER data are you planning on using? http://www.census.gov/cgi-bin/geo/shapefiles2010/main How will you deal with cases where people have used aerial imagery to follow the

[Talk-us] US-Mexico border precision

2010-12-13 Thread Nathan Edgars II
Does anyone have a better source for the border? It's horribly imprecise, at least in southeastern Texas: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=25.8903lon=-97.4978zoom=14layers=M ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org