In this case, should the caching server, the direct (WMS) server, or both be
recommended?
--
Saikrishna Arcot
On Monday, July 07, 2014 01:54:48 PM Ian Dees wrote:
Note that the OSM US server tiles and caches the USGS NAIP and High Res Orthos
and more information can be found here:
http://wik
Note that the OSM US server tiles and caches the USGS NAIP and High Res
Orthos and more information can be found here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Foundation/Local_Chapters/United_States/Servers/Imagery
...but the upstream USGS server that used to host this imagery seems to be
broken (it's
The project for the common imagery sources is here:
https://github.com/osmlab/editor-imagery-index
You could enter an issue there to include this source so that it will be
available in the various OSM editors. Before including it in the index, they
will want to ensure that the source is properl
Unfortunately, the high-resolution imagery isn't available everywhere in the US
yet, and Bing is better than the NAIP.
--
Saikrishna Arcot
On Sunday, July 06, 2014 08:28:27 AM Saikrishna Arcot wrote:
Hi all,
I noticed that there is a wiki page on the USGS High Resolution
Orthoimagery[1], but
Hi all,
I noticed that there is a wiki page on the USGS High Resolution
Orthoimagery[1], but that the link is outdated. The new resource to use is
likely one of these[2] folders. I've looked at the 1-foot imagery, and this
seems to be sharper or equal quality than the Bing imagery in at least t
5 matches
Mail list logo
