: Thomas Colson thomas_col...@nps.gov
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 5:57 AM
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] access restriction, water only: How to tag?
Yes. If a campsite is on a lake shore, or an island, and the only way to get
there is by boat, I don’t see how sac_scale
Yes. If a campsite is on a lake shore, or an island, and the only way to
get there is by boat, I don’t see how sac_scale depicts that information
If the campsite is on an island, then I feel that no additional tagging is
necessary.
If it is on shore, and the land around it is too dangerous, that
Am 26.07.2013 um 14:17 schrieb Mike Thompson miketh...@gmail.com:
I haven't seen sac_scale used on an area, but it seems reasonable
-1, it is clearly thought and defined for (osm-)highways and not for an area.
There are usually several possibilities where to cross an area, especially if
While I can't point to an example, I believe I've seen some state park
campsites that actually have a legal restriction against being accessed by
land. It might be that the terrain is considered too dangerous (park does not
want to assume liability for injuries), too ecologically sensitive or
2013/7/26 Tod Fitch t...@fitchdesign.com
While I can't point to an example, I believe I've seen some state park
campsites that actually have a legal restriction against being accessed by
land. It might be that the terrain is considered too dangerous (park does
not want to assume liability for
IMHO it isn't an attribute of the campsite but an attribute of the areas
in front of it.
agree (if by areas in front you mean the non water areas)
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 9:31 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
I haven't seen sac_scale used on an area, but it seems
2013/7/26 Mike Thompson miketh...@gmail.com
If we want to make the map explicit as to the difficulty of foot travel,
then we should have a tag that can be applied to an area indicating this.
Perhaps it isn't sac_scale, but we should have something.
the only established tags for areas I am
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
the only established tags for areas I am aware of are natural=scrub and
natural=wetland with sub tags (swamp, etc.), maybe this can be further
refined if required (density), or we can come up with new tags
Thompson [mailto:miketh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 12:44 PM
Cc: Open Street Map Talk-US
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] access restriction, water only: How to tag?
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
the only established tags for areas I
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:00 AM, Thomas Colson thomas_col...@nps.govwrote:
The intent is to convey what mode of travel is appropriate or “authorized”
for each of 100+ campsites. Many are hiker-only, easily solved by
“horse=no”, some are horse and hiker, a very few are hiker, horse, and
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Thomas Colson thomas_col...@nps.gov wrote:
I’m tagging some camp sites as “boat=yes” to imply water access only, but I
don’t think this is right. Is there a water-only access tag?
What information are you trying to record? access= generally informs
of a legal
By foot, impossible and serious injury if attempted.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Weait [mailto:rich...@weait.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 27, 2013 2:08 PM
To: Thomas Colson
Cc: talk-us@openstreetmap.org Openstreetmap
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] access restriction, water only: How to tag
Access=no, boat=yes?
On Jun 25, 2013 6:01 PM, Thomas Colson thomas_col...@nps.gov wrote:
I’m tagging some camp sites as “boat=yes” to imply water access only, but
I don’t think this is right. Is there a water-only access tag?
___
Talk-us
I'm tagging some camp sites as boat=yes to imply water access only, but I
don't think this is right. Is there a water-only access tag?
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
14 matches
Mail list logo
