I agree that OSM tags related to bicycle infrastructure could be expanded.
However, I'm not convinced many of the situations raised in this discussion
can't already be addressed by existing tags (e.g. vehicle=no for a street
with no vehicular access).
Bike boulevards are especially tricky, since
I have tagged 2 local living_streets that don't quite meet the strict
European definition, but they are blocked by bollards, which are rarely
dropped to allow service vehicles to enter.
On 3/23/2017 9:27 PM, Nathaniel V. Kelso wrote:
The existing OSM wiki documented tags for bicycle needs to
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 8:53 PM, Bryan Housel wrote:
> I have used the living street tag once in the USA, and that is for this
> street which is completely blocked by gates except for a side way in that
> locals know. I’m sure there are other similar situations around the
Every instance of highway=living_street I have come across in the US has
been people mistagging because snazzy European living streets sound so much
cooler (and render so much cooler) that regular old boring
highway=residential, bicycle=designated, sidewalk=both (which these streets
actually are).
As the editor of the tag in question, and a former resident of this
neighbourhood, I'll offer my perspective.
Tiffany Avenue is is a minor local street that is an important thru way for
bicycles and pedestrians in this neighbourhood and for those traveling from
the south side of the city to the
I agree that that Tiffany Avenue is just a normal street, not a “living
street”. Our driver even drove it a few times and you can see it pretty
clearly on Mapillary.
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=Tt-musXAKC5Qpuo7OAjyQA=photo=37.74456457237605=-122.42159001944155=19.941223418815095
I wanted to give a wider audience to this changeset discussion:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46967476
Some Mapzen folks have been changing highway=residential to
highway=living_street for routes that are designated as "Greenways."
There's a related blog post too:
7 matches
Mail list logo