rg; talk-us@openstreetmap.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Import WestCOG building footprints in
> south-west Connecticut
>
>
>
> Hi Julien,
>
> Unfortunately, I have limited knowledge on the data quality as I wasn't
> able to download it (the server returns erro
From: Yury Yatsynovich
Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2020 5:05 PM
To: Julien Lepiller
Cc: impo...@openstreetmap.org; talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Import WestCOG building footprints in
south-west Connecticut
Hi Julien,
Unfortunately, I have limited knowledge
Hi Julien,
Unfortunately, I have limited knowledge on the data quality as I wasn't
able to download it (the server returns error). I let the CT point of
contact (Scott) know about the problem -- he mentioned in our communication
that he forwarded the issue to the tech support team, but I haven't
So, it's been a week since that last message. Do you think we should
import addresses and buildings at the same time? Should we import the
buildings first and care about addresses later?
Yury, what are your thoughts about the data source quality? Do you
think it's a good idea to import from
Thank Julien for pushing this forward!
yeah, I tried to get addresses from here:
http://geodata-ctmaps.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/bfa7da83da384c2aa809882179369dc4_0/features/305004
and add them on top of the westCOG buildings.
The data is a big mess because it's a join_table of like 30
Le Sat, 22 Aug 2020 13:30:02 -0400,
Yury Yatsynovich a écrit :
> Hi Julien,
> The following communication that I've had recently with a CT official
> might be of interest to you:
>
>
Oh, great! I think we already saw this data (I tried to contact them
too, but never got a reply :/). From what
Hi Julien,
The following communication that I've had recently with a CT official might
be of interest to you:
*
Hi Yury,
At this point, yes, I think that’s correct. Obviously, we’d like if you
cite the state, but we don’t have set guidelines for that. I forwarded the
other issue with
7 matches
Mail list logo
