I see. Thanks for clarifying, Russell!
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 3:33 PM Russell Nelson wrote:
> It was an experiment, to see how accurate the three methods could be.
> That road, and many around it, are not completely built-out. When a new
> building is built on an empty parcel, it will have an
It was an experiment, to see how accurate the three methods could be.
That road, and many around it, are not completely built-out. When a new
building is built on an empty parcel, it will have an address
immediately. When a new address is assigned to a new (split out)
parcel, the
Oh, wow!
Maybe that's fine, but to me it looks like duplicated info. As far as I
understand, extrapolation lines are needed in areas where buildings are not
mapped yet and, hence, the extrapolation/approximate location of the
address is the best one can get. If the address is precisely assigned to
I have done this in the area around Potsdam, NY. Assigning the address
to the centroid of all the points that describe the parcel works quite
well. It's not perfect, though. Look at May Road. I've entered addresses
there in three different ways:
o On the building as an area, traced by hand
One building can definitely have more than a single address.
Addresses provide postal delivery information and don't necessarily correspond
1:1 with other concepts like physical buildings or legal parcels.
-mike.
michal migurski-
Legally in San Francisco does the address refer to the property, the
building, or the entrance?
While I'm from California originally, I admit that I don't know the
definition of an address there.
If one building can have more than one address (based on separate
entrances), then it would be best
I support this import.
I would also support the import of addresses for neighboring Oakland, CA.
-mike.
michal migurski- contact info and pgp key:
sf/cahttp://mike.teczno.com/contact.html
> On Jun 18, 2020, at 8:23
7 matches
Mail list logo
