* Mike N nice...@att.net [2011-10-23 14:24 -0400]:
I don't know why it didn't come in as railway=abandoned, but it
sounds like a rails-to-trails trail now.
In my experience, railway data in TIGER is much less likely to be up
to date than road data, presumably because census workers need to
In my experience, railway data in TIGER is much less likely to be up
to date than road data, presumably because census workers need to visit
people that live along roads, but railways are just convenient reference
points. There are railroad rights-of-way in Maryland that were
abandoned in
On 10/23/2011 2:07 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Alte Eisenbahn is German for old railway, which is a correct
description of the way
I don't have any reference, but locals do seem to use the German
designation as the name:
http://www.fuzzyworld3.com/3um/viewtopic.php?f=5t=4485
In the
On 10/23/11 2:07 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/17161384/history
Alte Eisenbahn is German for old railway, which is a correct
description of the way.
why do you think it's a screwup? do you have local knowledge of the
situation.
richard
On 10/23/2011 2:24 PM, Mike N wrote:
On 10/23/2011 2:07 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Alte Eisenbahn is German for old railway, which is a correct
description of the way
I don't have any reference, but locals do seem to use the German
designation as the name:
On 10/23/11 2:45 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 10/23/2011 2:34 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
On 10/23/11 2:07 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/17161384/history
Alte Eisenbahn is German for old railway, which is a correct
description of the way.
why do you think
On 10/23/2011 2:59 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
from Mike's comment, the name appears to likely be correct local usage.
Mike's link is from Wisconsin; the way is in Connecticut.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
On 10/23/11 3:02 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 10/23/2011 2:59 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
from Mike's comment, the name appears to likely be correct local usage.
Mike's link is from Wisconsin; the way is in Connecticut.
ok, fine, but you're still making an assumption that may turn out to be
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
On 10/23/11 3:02 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 10/23/2011 2:59 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
from Mike's comment, the name appears to likely be correct local usage.
Mike's link is from Wisconsin; the way is in
Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 3:32 PM, Richard Welty
rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
On 10/23/11 3:02 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 10/23/2011 2:59 PM, Richard Welty wrote:
from Mike's comment, the name appears to likely be correct local
usage.
Mike's link
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Can someone check TIGER 2010 to see what it currently says?
I just did. It's TLID 611694054. The name has been removed.
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
11 matches
Mail list logo
