There is an open item in iD to display the date of the aerial imagery alongside
the attribution message. We actually don’t get this from most tile providers,
but we can get it from Bing in the response header.
Would definitely welcome a pull request if someone wants to take a shot at
We need to make it more easier to load up-to-date imagery to our OSM editing
applications. And I think something easy as publicizing the date of the imagery
collection would get folks to do a double take before using older imagery.
Kristen
Sent from OWA on Android
Randy,
I just want to point out that there is an existing and well established
OSM-based service that already supplies worldwide boundaries in a number
of formats https://osm.wno-edv-service.de/boundaries/ .
Further the operator runs daily quality checks on changes in the boundaries.
Simon
Am
On 6/11/15 10:05 AM, Kam, Kristen wrote:
We need to make it more easier to load up-to-date imagery to our OSM editing
applications. And I think something easy as publicizing the date of the
imagery collection would get folks to do a double take before using older
imagery.
i am not
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 8:41 AM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net
wrote:
i'd like a tag that we could use that has some editor support, it might
be the
case that all we need is a pop up dialog when there's a README tag that
says
something like Read this before committing: text of
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Randy Meech randy.me...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us
wrote:
Seattle has very defined neighborhoods and even sub-neighborhoods. The
prior discussions kept us from adding the boundaries. Maybe it is
please, please when doing the armchair mapping thing, be aware
that aerial imagery may be several years out of date.
yesterday i discovered that a highway reconfiguration i'd mapped
in Rensselaer, NY had been realigned with the out-of-date bing
aerial imagery. i was able to locate my GPX tracks
I couldn't make it to SOTM-US because of time constraints, but wanted to
thank the sponsors and all who made the great videos!
http://stateofthemap.us/program/
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us
wrote:
The readme tag is more of a bandaid. A better way might be to capture the
image date as a tag. The editor could then issue a warning message if the
image date is older than the feature being modified.
The readme
Hi,
On 06/11/15 18:46, Mike N wrote:
I've seen this problem also - an area marked for construction, all
roads bulldozed out, - the roads re-appear due to a TIGEROSM
comparison test because they're in Bing.
An area where all buildings are demolished and a single large entity
takes
On 6/11/2015 12:46 PM, Mike N wrote:
I've seen this problem also - an area marked for construction, all
roads bulldozed out, - the roads re-appear due to a TIGEROSM
comparison test because they're in Bing.
Speaking of which, one of those came back to life yesterday. I tried
the README
Maybe we should invite the MapBox paid mappers to join in this conversation?
They are the major people doing this.
-James
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 21:10:58 -0400
From: nice...@att.net
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] a plea to armchair mappers
On 6/11/2015 12:46 PM,
It supports at least down to level 11, simply click on the entries and
it will display sub-boundaries and so on.
Not that there isn't room for further parallel services, but this wasn't
actually a vacuum :-). In particular anything helping improving
boundaries in the US is a good thing.
Simon
Hello,
Making imagery more up-to-date won't solve the problem.
The real problem is that OSM never communicates with its
members, expecially not with those armchair mappers who do
it recreationally. They are not reading the email lists, which are
mostly geeky and obsessed with
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote:
I just want to point out that there is an existing and well established
OSM-based service that already supplies worldwide boundaries in a number
of formats https://osm.wno-edv-service.de/boundaries/ .
Yes -- unless I'm
Another useful tool might be to have a repository of local imagery servers that
can automatically become available when in an appropriate area.
For instance, I use the 2014 NAIP imagery via a WMS server in JOSM. It’s only
1m resolution, but it’s great for double checking that nothing has
Such a thing exists and is here:
https://github.com/osmlab/editor-imagery-index
It is used by iD and Potlatch, with JOSM output available but not installed
by default.
I'm happy to help anyone add their imagery.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 11:36 AM, Darrell Fuhriman darr...@garnix.org
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Charlotte Wolter techl...@techlady.com
wrote:
Making imagery more up-to-date won't solve the problem.
The real problem is that OSM never communicates with its
members, expecially not with those armchair mappers who do
it recreationally. They are
On 6/11/15 12:46 PM, Mike N wrote:
My current strategy is to leave the original objects, just remove
all tagging except for a note about Bing imagery dated is out of
date.
i did this with a slip ramp from I-90 nearby that was removed when a
roundabout was put in; i had removed the
Shouldn’t be too hard to add this: https://github.com/rjhale1971/NAIP_WMS
https://github.com/rjhale1971/NAIP_WMS
Unfortunately, the WMS server seems to be misbehaving right now. I sent a note
to what I hope are the right people about that.
d.
On Jun 11, 2015, at 08:43, Ian Dees
this is a summary of previous discussion on newbies talk-us
we have an ongoing, persistent problem with armchair mappers
correcting the map to match out of date aerial imagery. i just
had to repair the map in Rensselaer, NY; the street named
Broadway was reconfigured in late 2012, and bing
On Thu, 2015-06-11 at 13:27 -0400, Richard Welty wrote:
so i have two things in mind here:
1) formalize the README tag as a way to caution future mappers
2) request editor support, when someone goes to change a
README tagged entity, it would be nice if editors would popup
a dialog saying
On 6/11/15 1:27 PM, Darrell Fuhriman wrote:
Shouldn’t be too hard to add this: https://github.com/rjhale1971/NAIP_WMS
Unfortunately, the WMS server seems to be misbehaving right now. I
sent a note to what I hope are the right people about that.
i had found Randy's page back when Darrell
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net
wrote:
1) formalize the README tag as a way to caution future mappers
2) request editor support, when someone goes to change a
README tagged entity, it would be nice if editors would popup
a dialog saying something along
Yes, it has. I was using it not all that long ago.
I’m sure it’s just a temporary outage.
d.
On Jun 11, 2015, at 10:59, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
On 6/11/15 1:27 PM, Darrell Fuhriman wrote:
Shouldn’t be too hard to add this: https://github.com/rjhale1971/NAIP_WMS
25 matches
Mail list logo
