On 08/19/2015 07:25 PM, stevea wrote:
This isn't extreme. Your backyard activity is consistent with the
definition of a forest: a land which is used for the production of
wood/lumber/timber/firewood/pulp/et cetera.
Frederik, Frederik, Frederik...where do I begin?!
According to our
Hi,
On 08/19/2015 07:25 PM, stevea wrote:
This isn't extreme. Your backyard activity is consistent with the
definition of a forest: a land which is used for the production of
wood/lumber/timber/firewood/pulp/et cetera.
There is a problem with this definition; it is too broad. Even the
John Firebaugh writes:
The political boundaries of US National Forests should not be tagged
landuse=forest unless the entirety of their area is land primarily
managed for timber production. I venture to assert that this is not
true for *any* of the National Forests. Here are some examples of
On 8/4/2015 4:59 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
Also, please even if you see the crossing rendered, do go in and
check, because I have seen more than once that the crossing node is
not a shared node between way and rail. (Hint, use 'j' to join node to
way and 'm' to merge nodes that are (almost) on
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:22 PM, stevea stevea...@softworkers.com wrote:
John Firebaugh writes:
The political boundaries of US National Forests should not be tagged
landuse=forest unless the entirety of their area is land primarily managed
for timber production. I venture to assert that
The political boundaries of US National Forests should not be tagged
landuse=forest unless the entirety of their area is land primarily managed
for timber production. I venture to assert that this is not true for *any*
of the National Forests. Here are some examples of areas within National
-Original Message-
From: stevea [mailto:stevea...@softworkers.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 20, 2015 11:22 PM
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Cc: John Firebaugh
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Tagging National Forests
Well, perhaps we have a happy compromise here. Tell you what: I'll
start with
7 matches
Mail list logo
