[Talk-us] iD news: v1.9.5 released

2016-05-25 Thread Bryan Housel
iD v1.9.5 was released May 25 2016 and is now available for editing on openstreetmap.org The release includes: - Fix bug causing Russian track type translated strings to sneak into tag values - Change color of save button as user edits increase (built by tanerochris)

Re: [Talk-us] Odd road / odd structure

2016-05-25 Thread Kevin Kenny
One more try - I'm still getting used to this 'gmail alias' stuff. My apologies if people are getting multiple copies - I'm getting bouncemail. On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Steve Friedl wrote: > I have some of that cursory knowledge, plus I actually hiked up there and >

Re: [Talk-us] Odd road / odd structure

2016-05-25 Thread Paul Johnson
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 10:19 PM, Bill Ricker wrote: > > ​While 'livable street'​ > > ​is an Urban Design term of at for the concept in some areas, I don't see > it in OSM wiki or taginfo ? [5] . OSM seems to use the similar > highway=living_street [6] for low speed

Re: [Talk-us] Proposed import cleanup: NYSDEClands

2016-05-25 Thread Kevin Kenny
I've been continuing to investigate the NYS DEC Lands file, because, as Paul Norman identified, the original import is not up to current OSM standards. I'm not going to apologize for reimporting - a reimport will surely leave less of a mess than what is there! It's become clear to me that for

Re: [Talk-us] Odd road / odd structure

2016-05-25 Thread Paul Johnson
On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Steve Friedl wrote: > > The Irvine GIS guy told me that Paisley Place also servers as a utility > easement, which may have impacted some of the design. These are quite > pretty little walkways, with a nice gate to enter, it’s just odd that it’s

Re: [Talk-us] Proposed import cleanup: NYSDEClands

2016-05-25 Thread Kevin Kenny
Oh, another question. Some of the New York state land parcels have rather complicated topology, and the previous import didn't get them entirely right: duplicated nodes, crossing ways, nodes close to other ways, and so on. Moreover, the upstream data are fairly arbitrarily divided. An example is

Re: [Talk-us] New MapRoulette now in early public beta

2016-05-25 Thread Rihards
On 2016.05.25. 22:01, Martijn van Exel wrote: Hi all, MapRoulette has been completely redone, hopefully keeping the good parts and improving on some things that were not so great. I’m pretty excited to announce that I have a public beta up now at http://maproulette.org:8080. I am very much

[Talk-us] New MapRoulette now in early public beta

2016-05-25 Thread Martijn van Exel
Hi all, MapRoulette has been completely redone, hopefully keeping the good parts and improving on some things that were not so great. I’m pretty excited to announce that I have a public beta up now at http://maproulette.org:8080 . I am very much looking forward

Re: [Talk-us] New MapRoulette now in early public beta

2016-05-25 Thread Valerie Anderson
gery if the cisterns aren't still in use as at least an emergency water > supply, given that particular stretch of hills' propensity for fire. It > has a dry climate, some plants that depend on fire for reproduction, and > eucalyptus, which the AU crowd can testify sets itself on fire for like, no >

Re: [Talk-us] New MapRoulette now in early public beta

2016-05-25 Thread Kevin Kenny
Should I expect it to be operating? I tried logging in, and the first purported aerodrome I got was the actual 'Branson West Airport'. It was well-mapped, so I clicked 'False Positive' and 'Next' - and got "KO: Invalid task status supplied". On Wed, May 25, 2016 at 3:01 PM, Martijn van Exel

Re: [Talk-us] New MapRoulette now in early public beta

2016-05-25 Thread Kevin Kenny
Logging out, flushing cookies, and logging in again brought me to 'Saint Charles Smartt Airfield' and 'False Positive' worked this time. ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Re: [Talk-us] Odd road / odd structure

2016-05-25 Thread Steve Friedl
I appreciate the many thoughtful replies here, thank you. For the street that’s not a street, somebody else had added it as a footway, which feels like exactly the right thing anyway. But, to the Civil Engineer :) * Ugh...this actually pains me as a civil engineer. Not for the