An active OSM group (leaving names, etc. out while they check out what I
reported) is running a script or plug-in or challenge called "to-fix" that
is apparently supposed to help fix incorrect turn:lanes values (and maybe
other things, I haven't investigated deeply enough).
The problem is, it's
On 8/24/2016 6:19 PM, Jack Burke wrote:
The problem is, it's breaking the values instead. I found a section of
road that I'd added turn:lanes to in order to provide lane guidance at
an exit. My original value of "none|none|none|none|none;slight_right"
was replaced by "slight_right".
I
And I, too, have a preference for using "none" instead of leaving and
endless line of "|" to try to parse. My eyesight isn't getting
better as I get older.
Having said that, if that had been the only thing they did, I wouldn't have
bothered saying anything. But when their edits turned
The link Jack's talking about,
https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/180
Regards,
Hans
On Aug 24, 2016 4:09 PM, "Toby Murray" wrote:
> Mind sharing the link to the GitHub issue?
>
> Do they think that "none" is an invalid option and are replacing it
> with a blank
I’m of half a mind to use a script to find the edits in my area where they
changed something like “left|none|none|” to “left||” and then revert them
manually.
I know they are both officially acceptable variations but for those of us
editing by hand counting the occurrences of “|none” to make
No, it's https://github.com/mapbox/mapping/issues/193
And they appear to be telling me that the combination "none;slight_right"
isn't valid.
Also, in their reply to me, they do specifically mention that they know
none is valid, yet they're replacing it anyway. And the worst part of it
is that
Mind sharing the link to the GitHub issue?
Do they think that "none" is an invalid option and are replacing it
with a blank globally? If so, this should be shut down immediately.
"none" and blank are both valid values and while I wouldn't mind
seeing it be consistent, any such edit would need to
Since I'm on e-mail tonight, I thought I'd bring folks up-to-date on some
ongoing road construction north and south of Atlanta that is rendering some
pretty important imagery out-of-date. So before you go about trying to
"fix" something that doesn't match the spy photos, please check around to
be
I never thought of that. When they get around to rerouting Windy Hill over
the Interstate, I might have to try that.
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Mike N wrote:
> On 8/24/2016 9:14 PM, Jack Burke wrote:
>
>> Since I'm on e-mail tonight, I thought I'd bring folks up-to-date
On 8/24/2016 9:14 PM, Jack Burke wrote:
Since I'm on e-mail tonight, I thought I'd bring folks up-to-date on
some ongoing road construction north and south of Atlanta that is
rendering some pretty important imagery out-of-date. So before you go
about trying to "fix" something that doesn't match
10 matches
Mail list logo