Hi,
As I was creating more ‘unnamed roads’ challenges in MapRoulette, and spot
checking them, I came across a number of cases like this one:
https://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3313/task/6414594
To my mind these need to be fixed, but I wanted to ask here first, so I can get
the
The rule I've always followed is that it's the highest _link unless it's at an
intersection with a named street, in which case the names roads just
connect.
The only exception I think could make sense is if the *only *function of
the connector is to connect to a service road–like in a
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 9:50 AM Clifford Snow
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 9:44 AM Martijn van Exel wrote:
>
>> It is worth noting that the current shape file available from USDA seems
>> to be more comprehensive than the forest service roads layer available:
>>
On 11/20/18 16:06, Martijn van Exel wrote:
> Hi,
> As I was creating more ‘unnamed roads’ challenges in MapRoulette, and spot
> checking them, I came across a number of cases like this one:
>
> https://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3313/task/6414594
>
> To my mind these need to be fixed, but
On 11/20/18 16:23, Andrew wrote:
> The rule I've always followed is that it's the highest _link unless it's
> at an intersection with a named street, in which case the names roads
> just connect.
>
> The only exception I think could make sense is if the /*only* /function
> of the connector is to
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 4:06 PM Martijn van Exel wrote:
> Hi,
> As I was creating more ‘unnamed roads’ challenges in MapRoulette, and spot
> checking them, I came across a number of cases like this one:
>
> https://maproulette.org/mr3/challenge/3313/task/6414594
>
> To my mind these need to be
FrederiK:
The US Forest Service is part of the Department of Agriculture(USDA) and has
quite an extensive network of all of their roads including logging trails.
In fact it is almost too much.
Here is a link to the Authority, I hope it helps.
https://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/
Tom Roff-
HPMS/
Hi,
apparently you have something in the US called "Forest Routes"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forest_Highway
which even has its own kind of shield! (Yes I know, there are *many*
shields. I've followed the discussions!)
Is there some common understanding of how to map these, if at all? I've
Frederik,
I don’t remember it being widely discussed / agreed upon.
When I map these roads I include the FS number (just the number) as a ref,
since that is how they are signposted in the field.
https://dcasler.com/2011/06/16/owl-creek-pass-getting-there-from-ridgway/
As other have mentioned, there are many numbered roads managed by the
USFS. They range in development from closed, abandoned log roads to
well maintained pavement. I map them using the FS prefix.
For the general public one of the main uses is the publication of
motor vehicle access conditions:
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 9:44 AM Martijn van Exel wrote:
> It is worth noting that the current shape file available from USDA seems
> to be more comprehensive than the forest service roads layer available:
> https://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/edw/datasets.php?dsetCategory=transportation
>
>
>
Worth noting that most people just call them forest service roads. I've
never heard anyone call them "forest highways."
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018, 9:27 AM Max Erickson As other have mentioned, there are many numbered roads managed by the
> USFS. They range in development from closed, abandoned log
It is worth noting that the current shape file available from USDA seems to be
more comprehensive than the forest service roads layer available:
https://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/edw/datasets.php?dsetCategory=transportation
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 12:27 PM Max Erickson wrote:
> As other have mentioned, there are many numbered roads managed by the
> USFS. They range in development from closed, abandoned log roads to
> well maintained pavement. I map them using the FS prefix.
>
> For the general public one of the
14 matches
Mail list logo
