Am 24. Juni 2019 19:18:26 MESZ schrieb Greg Troxel :
>One wonders how RTC squares this decision with their legal obligation
>to
>act in the public interest. Not sharing data at all to get "related
>income" to fund their operation is one thing, but sharing with Google
>while not with OSM
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 10:50 AM Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> OSM was founded in 2004 on the principle of "if they won't give us the
> data, we'll make it ourselves" and that still holds true. I've started
> on making sure all rail-trails of a reasonable length (say, 5 miles
> upwards) are actually
Hi all,
You might remember that back in March I wondered whether we could get
access to the Rails-to-Trails Conservancy's data, which they've given to
Google:
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2019-March/019266.html
Helpful people on this list followed that up with RTC
Richard Fairhurst writes:
> Hi all,
>
> You might remember that back in March I wondered whether we could get
> access to the Rails-to-Trails Conservancy's data, which they've given
> to Google:
>
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2019-March/019266.html
>
> Helpful people on
https://gisdata.mn.gov/dataset/us-mn-state-metrogis-trans-metro-colabtiv-trails-bike
Someone could go nuts with this data from MN.
Joe
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Kenny
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2019 11:15 AM
To: Richard Fairhurst
Cc: talk-us
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Mapping rail
5 matches
Mail list logo
