Re: [Talk-us] Changeset needs to be reverted

Hi, I will probably undelete all deleted ways and then revert the relations to re-add them, except where the stray nodes were already cleaned up (assuming that in these areas, a human mapper has evaluated the situation and fixed it). We'll see how that goes. Turns out that about 6,000 of

Re: [Talk-us] [Tagging] Route Relations and Special (Bannered) Routes

On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Phil! Gold phi...@pobox.com wrote: I'd like to solicit some thoughts on the tagging for special routes (commonly known as bannered routes)[0].  In route relations, it's customary to separate the network and the reference number.  How do or should special

Re: [Talk-us] [Tagging] Route Relations and Special (Bannered) Routes

On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote: increasing specificity on the network tag like network=US:US:Alt follows the original intent of the network tag.  It also offers the least surprise to naive consumers of the data. I would agree with this. From the point

Re: [Talk-us] Changeset needs to be reverted

On 3/13/2012 9:33 AM, Frederik Ramm wrote: http://www.remote.org/frederik/tmp/problems.html (The what nodes column lists the nodes missing for a revert.) If that is desirable, I can undelete the nodes and revert the ways thereafter. I'm willing to clean up if you do this. Thanks.

Re: [Talk-us] Changeset needs to be reverted

Hi, On 03/13/2012 08:20 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: If that is desirable, I can undelete the nodes and revert the ways thereafter. I'm willing to clean up if you do this. Thanks. Done, all ways in Montana and Idaho reverted clean. Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail

Re: [Talk-us] Changeset needs to be reverted

On 3/13/2012 5:14 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote: Hi, On 03/13/2012 08:20 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote: If that is desirable, I can undelete the nodes and revert the ways thereafter. I'm willing to clean up if you do this. Thanks. Done, all ways in Montana and Idaho reverted clean. Hmmm - now