Re: [Talk-us] Excellent progress, u.s.

2012-04-15 Thread Toby Murray
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 7:26 PM, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote: andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote: On 14 April 2012 03:30, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote: One drawback to this new-coordinate technique is that, in some cases, the tainted nodes will have been

Re: [Talk-us] tiff, dwg and nad83

2012-04-15 Thread Randal Hale
So I missed the whole exchange - so I read what little I see below and here are my thoughts. I don't think it's too GIS geeky - it's too OSM geeky. There are too many ways to get to a common goal - adding data. You can import, GPS, walk around, etc etc. There almost needs to be a list

Re: [Talk-us] tiff, dwg and nad83

2012-04-15 Thread Serge Wroclawski
Also, the original mail in this thread was on imports, which is by its nature, a technical list. Folks who don't have a *ton* of experience shouldn't do imports, and folks with a ton of experience don't do imports. - Serge ___ Talk-us mailing list

Re: [Talk-us] tiff, dwg and nad83

2012-04-15 Thread Randal Hale
..and I'll end my part in this with this - I've contacted the two people I am interested in helping. I will talk to them and work our way through the problem. I am interested in getting more people editing - not arguing over the technical. As for imports - I guess I shouldn't have imported

Re: [Talk-us] tiff, dwg and nad83

2012-04-15 Thread Dale Puch
Documentation! I think what you did is exactly what is needed. It may or may not need improvements. If what is decided in the newsgroups is not put down in the wiki then the discussion was not finished to a point someone could sum it up for the masses to follow. Then post a link here for