The other thing that has come up is that there are a lot of TIGER edges that
do not correspond to OSM ways in either their old or new version In Indiana
most of these seem to be linear water. Were these intentionally excluded
from OSM? Or would it be useful to try to pick them up as part of the
On 3/16/2013 5:06 PM, Russ Nelson wrote:
I'm surprised by how bad the NHD data is. I downloaded some of it in
.OSM format, and my casual hand digitization off Bing maps is much
better. If I say so myself, which I do.
That's not surprising if they last updated the NHD data between 1990
and
These are based off of Lambertus's work here:
http://garmin.openstreetmap.nl
If you have questions or comments about these maps, please feel
free to ask. However, please do not send me private mail. The
odds are, someone else will have the same questions, and by
asking on the talk-us@
Eric,
I'm in general favor of your idea. I think that if we can get more
accurate, up to date data out of TIGER, then we should.
I'd strongly encourage you to join us on the OSM US Import Committee list:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports-us
- Serge
On 3/16/13 7:59 PM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
Eric,
I'm in general favor of your idea. I think that if we can get more
accurate, up to date data out of TIGER, then we should.
I'd strongly encourage you to join us on the OSM US Import Committee list:
Thanks. I just joined the list and will send a message there.
Eric
On Sat, Mar 16, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Serge Wroclawski emac...@gmail.com wrote:
Eric,
I'm in general favor of your idea. I think that if we can get more
accurate, up to date data out of TIGER, then we should.
I'd strongly
6 matches
Mail list logo
