* Jay Boyer bo...@snhdmail.org [2013-10-10 13:34 -0700]:
Enterprise is an unincorporated town. But Enterprise is actually part of Las
Vegas and all of the addresses within Enterprise are Las Vegas addresses.
Enterprise is this area: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/170132
On 10/14/13 9:57 AM, Phil! Gold wrote:
* Jay Boyer bo...@snhdmail.org [2013-10-10 13:34 -0700]:
Enterprise is an unincorporated town. But Enterprise is actually part of
Las Vegas and all of the addresses within Enterprise are Las Vegas
addresses.
Enterprise is this area:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.netwrote:
also, i would be remiss if i didn't point out that post office delivery
addressing
is only vaguely related to the actual administrative boundaries; the
addressing
situation for Enterprise is hardly unique, in fact
The election has closed. We are awaiting check off by our independent
observers,
Henk Hoff and Mike Collinson of OSMF, before announcing the results.
Thanks to everyone who participated,
Richard
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
I have been looking at the OSM data for Las Vegas and there are some serious
problems for it. The OSM boundary for Las Vegas encompasses about half of the
city. Certain areas of Las Vegas, including Paradise, Enterprise, Spring
Valley and probably others are not within the city boundaries
Hi all,
Here at Telenav we have been looking at complex intersections and we
have set about editing some of these intersections in a way we feel
represents the situation on the ground better than their original
state, and because of that, works better for us. We have received some
feedback on our
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Martijn van Exel marti...@telenav.comwrote:
Hi all,
Here at Telenav we have been looking at complex intersections and we
have set about editing some of these intersections in a way we feel
represents the situation on the ground better than their original
Jay,
I don't think the data is incorrect. If you look at the City of Las Vegas
webmap (
http://clvplaces.appspot.com/apps/interactive/clvpi.htm#ctrLat=36.27433191227921ctrLng=-115.18729447119142zoom=11layers=|10435|10010userMarkers=0mapType=roadmap)
and turn on the Cities and City Limits layers,
On 10/14/13 1:52 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Martijn van Exel
marti...@telenav.com mailto:marti...@telenav.com wrote:
Hi all,
Here at Telenav we have been looking at complex intersections and we
have set about editing some of these intersections in a
On 10/14/13 1:13 PM, Jay Boyer wrote:
I have been looking at the OSM data for Las Vegas and there are some
serious problems for it. The OSM boundary for Las Vegas encompasses
about half of the city. Certain areas of Las Vegas, including
Paradise, Enterprise, Spring Valley and probably
2013/10/14 Martijn van Exel marti...@telenav.com
So what are we talking about? Intersections like this one, where one
or more dual carriageways come together at an at-grade intersection:
So what are we talking about? Intersections like this one, where one
or more dual carriageways come together at an at-grade intersection:
https://www.evernote.com/shard/s9/sh/6438c196-bb92-4f66-81dc-9b75186286ba/0e8f07ff527c6a85c0dec426b9b79f1e
One of my colleagues at Telenav has remapped this
2013/10/14 stevea stevea...@softworkers.com
Hi Martijn: one thing wrong I do see at this particular intersection
are extraneous nodes with highway=crossing tags: two extra ones on the
(northerly) east-west ped-path and one extra one each of the (westerly and
easterly) north-south ped-paths.
To expand on the point of having both methods used, starting with the
multiple intersection points method, what if all four intersection
points were under a relation of a group of intersections, and the
number of lanes on each way was marked? That way, routing algorithms
could convert from the
The latter (after) version matches the traffic signal wiki
http://wiki.openstreetmaps.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtraffic_signals#Tag_all_incoming_ways
It makes sense to me and is the way I prefer.
Tod
--
Sent from my mobile device. Please excuse my brevity.
Martijn van Exel marti...@telenav.com
I prefer, and always use, the after pattern.
/Stellan
On 2013-10-14 7:42 PM, Martijn van Exel wrote:
Hi all,
Here at Telenav we have been looking at complex intersections and we
have set about editing some of these intersections in a way we feel
represents the situation on the ground better
I too prefer the after pattern since it is easier to do, especially when
you are making a road be dual-carriageway by using the parallel way
feature in Potlatch 2. Also, it matches the way it is on the ground better.
Since there seems to be unanimous agreement to map intersections this way,
then
Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote:
On 10/14/13 1:52 PM, Ian Dees wrote:
On Mon, Oct 14, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Martijn van Exel
marti...@telenav.com mailto:marti...@telenav.com wrote:
Hi all,
Here at Telenav we have been looking at complex intersections
and we
18 matches
Mail list logo
