I've also see buildings merged that may appear to be one building from above
but are in fact two. A single building cannot straddle two tax parcels. In
general, visual information in NYC is sometimes not enough to warrant a change.
Example below of a building with two separate address points
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Reilly, Colin crei...@doitt.nyc.gov
wrote:
I’ve also see buildings merged that may appear to be one building from
above but are in fact two.
Do you have better imagery that we would be able to use? I think that would
help in this case.
Cheers,
Katie
A
On 9/19/2014 7:00 AM, Bryan Housel wrote:
We really should come up with a good way to make authoritative data
harder to edit in the various editors.
All that a particular data source can be authoritative for is what that
data source says something is. What is authoritative for OSM is the
On 9/19/2014 6:19 AM, Reilly, Colin wrote:
A single building cannot straddle two tax parcels.
This seems incorrect. If I build a structure on two tax parcels, it can
exist as a single building. It may not be legal, or may require planning
tricks that make it two buildings in the eyes of the
://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/attachments/20140919/b0025bdb/attachment-0001.html
--
Message: 2
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 09:06:31 -0700
From: Paul Norman penor...@mac.com
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Merging NYC buildings
Message-ID: 541c5487.7000
The thing is, once it's in OSM, it's not NYC's data anymore--it's
everyone's data. So it's no longer authoritative. Sometimes the crowd
will improve it or add to it, sometimes the crowd will screw it up,
sometimes the crowd will do it differently than you think is best. The
theory (borne out in
Hi,
the building to the east. In this case it was the tax parcel and multiple
address that indicate two buildings not one.
We have a the MA state tax parcel data as a translucent imaging layer
hosted on the US OSM. It can be used in JOSM, and it useful for all
kinds of things. Perhaps, the
How does the mapping community feel about tagging the location of speed
limit signs? I remember another mapper brought up this topic somewhere
outside the mailing list. The mapper explained that he mapped the location
of speed limit signs for future reference to verify the speed limits of
roads. I
Hans,
I think sign locations would be great! I just entered a ton of speed
limits a couple months back and wish I'd had thought to add them somehow...
The only concern I would have is that the direction they're facing be
indicated. On long roads with few intersections, placing them by one
side
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 8:13 PM, Nate Wessel bike...@gmail.com wrote:
I would not want to see signs placed as a point on the line except maybe
on one-ways. How do other types of road signs indicate directionality? Has
this already been effectively resolved? I don't actually think I've ever
10 matches
Mail list logo
