Re: [Talk-us] cycle.travel US bike routing, and unreviewed rural TIGER

2015-06-14 Thread stevea
Richard Fairhurst writes: Finally, many thanks to everyone who's tested it so far, particularly Steve All - your feedback was and continues to be enormously useful. Kind of you to say this, Richard. I was delighted to help test your fine bicycle router. I wish cycle.travel, and especially

Re: [Talk-us] cycle.travel US bike routing, and unreviewed rural TIGER

2015-06-14 Thread Minh Nguyen
On 2015-06-13 17:08, Harald Kliems wrote: Very nice, Richard! One quick comment: I might not be the only who doesn't always change the tiger:reviewed tag when fixing TIGER-imported roads. I don't know if that's technically feasible, but maybe it would be better to check if a way has been

Re: [Talk-us] Data sources for National Monument boundaries?

2015-06-14 Thread stevea
Ian McEwen writes: Does anyone know where this data is available/usable for OSM purposes? You might try http://data.fs.usda.gov/geodata/edw/datasets.php?dsetCategory=boundaries where you can scroll down to National Forest Lands with Nationally Designated Management or Use Limitations and

Re: [Talk-us] Data sources for National Monument boundaries?

2015-06-14 Thread Clifford Snow
Steve, That Ten Steps plan sounds interesting. I would appreciate a copy as well. Clifford On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 8:41 AM, stevea stevea...@softworkers.com wrote: Ian McEwen writes: Does anyone know where this data is available/usable for OSM purposes? You might try

Re: [Talk-us] a plea to armchair mappers

2015-06-14 Thread Minh Nguyen
On 2015-06-11 06:42, Richard Welty wrote: please, please when doing the armchair mapping thing, be aware that aerial imagery may be several years out of date. yesterday i discovered that a highway reconfiguration i'd mapped in Rensselaer, NY had been realigned with the out-of-date bing aerial

Re: [Talk-us] a plea to armchair mappers

2015-06-14 Thread Richard Welty
On 6/14/15 2:27 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote: With both outdated imagery and the Ohio River [1], I've had better luck placing redundant `note` tags on every way that such a mapper would be inclined to delete. iD shows `note` in a big box in the sidebar. It's a bit harder to miss than a (heretofore)

Re: [Talk-us] cycle.travel US bike routing, and unreviewed rural TIGER

2015-06-14 Thread Harald Kliems
Well, you've certainly motivated me to from now on always modify the tiger:reviewed tag :-) Thanks again for your efforts! On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 2:38 PM Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote: Harald Kliems wrote: Very nice, Richard! One quick comment: I might not be the only who

Re: [Talk-us] Data sources for National Monument boundaries?

2015-06-14 Thread Jim McAndrew
We (NPMap at the National Park Service) use the IRMA boundaries for most of our maps, but we have updated a few of the park boundaries in our own database. You can find our data here: https://nationalparkservice.cartodb.com/u/nps/tables/parks On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Clifford Snow

Re: [Talk-us] cycle.travel US bike routing, and unreviewed rural TIGER

2015-06-14 Thread Paul Norman
On 6/14/2015 2:24 PM, Harald Kliems wrote: Well, you've certainly motivated me to from now on always modify the tiger:reviewed tag :-) Thanks again for your efforts! The most important change is probably setting appropriate surface information. I don't know the exact secret sauce magic of

Re: [Talk-us] cycle.travel US bike routing, and unreviewed rural TIGER

2015-06-14 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Harald Kliems wrote: Very nice, Richard! One quick comment: I might not be the only who doesn't always change the tiger:reviewed tag when fixing TIGER-imported roads. I don't know if that's technically feasible, but maybe it would be better to check if a way has been modified since