I don’t see why your idea should not receive some more consideration. Don’t
give up so easily - people may just have missed the message or not had the time
to read your proposal when you initially posted it.
Why don’t you create a wiki page with what you have using the import guidelines
as a
Ditto to Mike’s comments.
I’ve been dealing with the clean up of bad imports, usually TIGER but others
too, where ever I map so I think I understand where people like Frederick are
coming from.
But I also see the reality in the U.S. of huge geographical areas with very few
OSM mappers. An all
I support the careful import of high quality data whose license is
compatible with OSM. Those appears to be one of those cases. I believe the
existence of high quality data will aid in the recruitment of new mappers
and will encourage high quality contributions from those mappers. It is
much
Since I received only a total of three comments about this idea, one
strongly negative (from Frederik Ramm) and two only lukewarm in support,
I'm forced to conclude that this proposal has no chance of gaining a
broad community support. Consider it withdrawn.
I find myself somewhat frustrated
Hi all,
I am giving a 20 minute intro to OSM as part of a larger workshop on Open
Source / Open Data at the GIS for Transportation symposium next month. From the
web site: "The American Association of State Highway and Transportation
Officials sponsors the annual GIS for Transportation
5 matches
Mail list logo