Re: [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

2016-09-02 Thread David Mease
This is all good information and it should be in OSM. I'm just saying it doesn't need to be in there twice. > On Sep 2, 2016, at 3:47 PM, Jack Burke wrote: > > Tagging maxspeed is purely for a router. So are turn restrictions > As for turn:lanes meant for complex

Re: [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

2016-09-02 Thread Jack Burke
Tagging maxspeed is purely for a router. So are turn restrictions. As for turn:lanes meant for complex intersectionsthe examples in the wiki show very simple uses. I can't see anything in it, or the discussion page, indicating that it is only for complex intersections. Certainly there is a

Re: [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

2016-09-02 Thread Paul Johnson
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 12:18 PM, David Mease wrote: > I thing my reservations about this type of tagging is that this may be > "tagging for the router". > On some level, all of it is. > I still view the turn:lanes scheme as a (probably incomplete) way of > describing

Re: [Talk-us] Freeway exit tagging

2016-09-02 Thread David Mease
I thing my reservations about this type of tagging is that this may be "tagging for the router". I still view the turn:lanes scheme as a (probably incomplete) way of describing complex intersections. Tagging simple intersections with this scheme just to get a routing engine to display the

Re: [Talk-us] [Tagging] Freeway exit tagging

2016-09-02 Thread Paul Johnson
On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 8:56 PM, Jack Burke wrote: > Would love to compare notes on that, but it'll have to be later next week. > > If you want to look at what I do for exits, feel free to examine pretty > much all of them on I 75 south of Atlanta, as well as through downtown.