Hi,
yesterday I repaired a hole in the NY/Connecticut state boundary here:
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/46107026
It appears that individual city and county boundaries had, earlier,
extended out to meet the state boundary in the middle of the water, and
had now been changed to
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:53 AM, John F. Eldredge
wrote:
> One thing that is an issue with many of the marked bike lanes in
> Nashville, TN is that they aren't contiguous. You will come to a point
> where the road narrows, such as for a bridge, and the bikes are forced to
One thing that is an issue with many of the marked bike lanes in
Nashville, TN is that they aren't contiguous. You will come to a point
where the road narrows, such as for a bridge, and the bikes are forced
to share a lane with motor traffic. This makes bike riding at rush hour
a risky
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 10:11 AM, Spencer Gardner
wrote:
> Good catch on the MUTCD language. I'm not opposed to tagging with a bike
> lane and a parking lane, but then what should be used as the assumed width
> of the bike lane? This has direct relevance for my
Good catch on the MUTCD language. I'm not opposed to tagging with a bike
lane and a parking lane, but then what should be used as the assumed width
of the bike lane? This has direct relevance for my application, where I
need to know how wide a bike lane is. Would you suggest an assumed width
for
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Spencer Gardner
wrote:
> The problem I see with that approach is that it doesn't distinguish
> between a road with a striped bike lane next to a parking lane and a road
> with the combined lane.
>
I'm not sure that's a distinction that
No. That's not a mistake. My city uses this as a standard treatment in a
number of locations. And as was mentioned earlier this facility type is
also common in California.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 9:49 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Spencer
On Fri, Feb 3, 2017 at 11:11 AM, Spencer Gardner
wrote:
> Hi all. Has anyone worked out a good tagging scheme for combined
> bike/parking lanes? I'm not sure how common they are elsewhere but there
> are a number of such facilities in my city.
>
> For reference, you can
8 matches
Mail list logo