Re: [Talk-us] Best practice in Lane Editing 3

yeah, I agree.. just prodding thought. On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 3:21 PM Tod Fitch wrote: > At least one routing app I have been using seems to use the turn:lane > tagging [1] convention shown on the wiki. That allows the route guidance to > let you know you should be

Re: [Talk-us] Best practice in Lane Editing 3

At least one routing app I have been using seems to use the turn:lane tagging [1] convention shown on the wiki. That allows the route guidance to let you know you should be getting into the turn lane at an appropriate time. Not sure if the change:lanes [2] tagging is being followed but it does

Re: [Talk-us] Ferry durations

I update Martijn overpass query to find ferry routes without a duration tag. Washington State is considered to have the largest ferry system in the world, but damm, I didn't know there were so many ferry routes in the state! These are just the one's without a duration tag. I have emails into a

Re: [Talk-us] Best practice in Lane Editing 3

Case 1: First example is much closer to how I would tag it based on the the rule that it should not be a separate way if it is only separated by paint. Case 2: I would not expect the two paths to be considered safe or legal where I live in the US (not in Michigan). While there is some effort at

Re: [Talk-us] Best practice in Lane Editing 3

On 07/13/2017 02:15 AM, Horea Meleg wrote: > *According to US driving rules, are those turns allowed? Are you allowed > to go on the link if you are coming from South?* Probably not; even if technically not prohibited explicitly, it would probably be cited as reckless driving or careless driving