On 1/23/2018 8:29 PM, Albert Pundt wrote:
I certainly don't intend to delete and recreate any relations for no
reason. Links with other boundary types will of course also be kept. The
state boundary itself will likely be redone as well to match the more
accurate newer TIGER data, though along
> > I noticed many of the county lines in Pennsylvania are off by quite a
> > bit. I took the county lines from TIGER 2017 and imported them into
> > JOSM, and am ready to begin switching out the existing county lines
> Do you mean you'll keep the relations intact and just replace the member
>
Hi,
On 01/24/2018 12:46 AM, Albert Pundt wrote:
> I noticed many of the county lines in Pennsylvania are off by quite a
> bit. I took the county lines from TIGER 2017 and imported them into
> JOSM, and am ready to begin switching out the existing county lines
Do you mean you'll keep the
I noticed many of the county lines in Pennsylvania are off by quite a bit.
I took the county lines from TIGER 2017 and imported them into JOSM, and am
ready to begin switching out the existing county lines in OSM. However, I
know to discuss before attempting any import, especially one of this
4 matches
Mail list logo
