The US forum is pretty low traffic (a couple posts this year), so I
guess a topic wouldn't bother anyone:

https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=20

There's also a michigan channel on the osm us slack.

( https://slack.openstreetmap.us/ )

On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 10:58 PM Kevin Kenny <kevin.b.ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> (Is there a Michigan-specific forum that we could take this to? We're
> probably boring the daylights out of most of talk-us.)
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2019 at 9:16 PM Max Erickson <maxerick...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The management units in the data are subunits of the state forests
> > still. For instance, "Gwinn Forest Management Unit" is/was part of the
> > Escanaba River State Forest.
> >
> > The question is which data is better to present to the average end
> > user. I guess if the state isn't using the state forest names anymore
> > it makes sense to have the management units in OSM. But then because
> > people know the older names, does it make sense to also have the state
> > forests?
>
> What I see in the data doesn't match your description.  'Unit_name'
> appears to be one of sixteen large rectangular regions, and then
> 'management_name' is a fairly small region.
>
> I've sliced the data both ways, and put the results in
> https://kbk.is-a-geek.net/tmp/mi_sf.zip, so that you can open the data
> in JOSM and see what's up with it. DO NOT IMPORT - the translation is
> very rough and doesn't even pass JOSM's validation - I'm simply
> sharing it so that locals can see whether either division makes any
> sense in the local context.
>
> Simply coalescing the data led to topological problems, as I
> anticipated. I did some jiggery-pokery with ST_Buffer in PostGIS to
> force the topology to be consistent. The result is that every parcel's
> boundary is set back 2.5 metres from where it was in the original data
> set. This is surely no big deal as far as the map is concerned, but
> cuts way back on the validation errors.

_______________________________________________
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us

Reply via email to