On May 12, 2020, at 8:43 PM, wrote:
> Butting in for my *long* two cents:
I appreciate you doing so.
> Please correct me if I'm wrong in characterizing boundary=administrative like
> this; I'm still not sure that I've nailed it down.
I'd say (and for the many-th time, I'm not a political
Butting in for my *long* two cents:
I've lived in Rhode Island all of my life, until I moved to Boston for college.
When I was younger and dumber (read: fifteen), I discovered the admin_level tag
and thought, "Hey, why isn't my county admin_level=6? It says on this list that
US counties are
Note that vandalism in OSM and similar project is considered as
something that is not only damaging but also malicious and
intended to be damaging.
In cases where you consider other mapper as mistaken and
wrong, but not malicious - consider using other terms.
See
On May 11, 2020, at8:28:48 PM PDT, Martin Machyna wrote:
> I am just going to paste here what I wrote on Slack and I as well consider
> removal of counties from admin_level=6 as vandalism.
It is not vandalism, it is an established, consensus-driven, years-old tagging
principle, fully
4 matches
Mail list logo
