On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 3:44 PM Volker Schmidt wrote:
>
> There are many different OSM tagging "dialects" to describe the details of
> a foot-cycle-way crossing a road.
> I looked up the situation of the example on Mapillary. From that it looks
> as if the specific path is a combined foot cycle
ot;
>
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 6:11 AM Doug Peterson <
> dougpeter...@dpeters2.dyndns.org> wrote:
>
> > I have noticed in my area where some people have been adding crossings to
> > a designated cycleway (named and signed as a bike trail). The crossings
> are
&g
There are many different OSM tagging "dialects" to describe the details of
a foot-cycle-way crossing a road.
I looked up the situation of the example on Mapillary. From that it looks
as if the specific path is a combined foot cycle way (yellow diamond sign
with a bicycle and a pedestrian side by
all of my edits are using the ID presets.
Nathan P
email: natf...@gmail.com
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 11:53 AM Mark Wagner wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Aug 2020 07:11:01 -0400 (EDT)
> "Doug Peterson" wrote:
>
> > I have noticed in my area where some people have been adding
> > crossings to a designated
On Fri, 07 Aug 2020 07:11:01 -0400 (EDT)
"Doug Peterson" wrote:
> I have noticed in my area where some people have been adding
> crossings to a designated cycleway (named and signed as a bike
> trail). The crossings are fine. It is that the crossing is then been
> changed to a footway.
>
> I
Yeah, I think the defaults in iD are most likely what's causing this
tagging. I've seen a lot of it in my area as well.
Harald (hobbesvsboyle)
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 1:36 PM James Umbanhowar wrote:
> I think that iD doesn't have a preset for cycleway=crossing so that
> editors may think that
I think that iD doesn't have a preset for cycleway=crossing so that
editors may think that is not a valid tag for a crossing.
On Fri, 2020-08-07 at 14:04 -0400, Doug Peterson wrote:
> That wiki page was helpful. In one set of cases the change was from
> highway=cycleway on the way to
That wiki page was helpful. In one set of cases the change was from
highway=cycleway on the way to highway=footway and adding footway=crossing. In
another set it added highway=crossing to the intersection node. It looks like
from the crossing wiki that the tagging should really be on the node.
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 12:49 PM Natfoot wrote:
> here is my example and location specific response
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/663362208
>
I'd probably call that highway=path, bicycle=designated, foot=yes based off
what I'm seeing in the aerial photography. I seem to recall it was
here is my example and location specific response
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/663362208
Nathan P
email: natf...@gmail.com
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 10:14 AM Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-us <
talk-us@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> Aug 7, 2020, 13:11 by dougpeter...@dpeters2.dyndns.org:
>
> I
Aug 7, 2020, 13:11 by dougpeter...@dpeters2.dyndns.org:
> I have noticed in my area where some people have been adding crossings to a
> designated cycleway (named and signed as a bike trail). The crossings are
> fine. It is that the crossing is then been changed to a footway.
>
link?
>
> I
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 6:11 AM Doug Peterson <
dougpeter...@dpeters2.dyndns.org> wrote:
> I have noticed in my area where some people have been adding crossings to
> a designated cycleway (named and signed as a bike trail). The crossings are
> fine. It is that the crossing is then been changed to
I have noticed in my area where some people have been adding crossings to a
designated cycleway (named and signed as a bike trail). The crossings are fine.
It is that the crossing is then been changed to a footway.
I have looked at the highway=cycleway wiki and not seen anything addressing
13 matches
Mail list logo
