Something else to consider is that even though there is a perimeter for
a fire, there can be highly variable impacts on the landcover within
the perimeter. Some areas may have not burned, other areas only burned
the understory, some with limited burning of trees and other with full
tree killing
> > usa city bounders.
> >
> > https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/geography/contact.html
> >
> > and did you read what the other guy said, this is the census data
> > not true map data.
> >
> > https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/895
:
> i am looking at the TIRGER web, show’s the real map online and
> nothing you did matches.
>
> i live here and a block away from the edens spur just saying.
>
> > Tuesday, August 18, 2020 10:38 AM -05:00 from James Umbanhowar <
> > jumba...@gmail.com>:
&g
It would probably be best if these suggestions were added in the
changeset comments, as they don't need to be discussed on the mailing
list.
On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 11:36 -0400, James Umbanhowar wrote:
> I'm the person who made the changes and am happy to adjust the map to
> better authori
I'm the person who made the changes and am happy to adjust the map to
better authoritative data or information. My motivation for this was
to fix a mangled boundary relation that didn't have consistent outer
and inner members. The changes came in two changesets,
I think that iD doesn't have a preset for cycleway=crossing so that
editors may think that is not a valid tag for a crossing.
On Fri, 2020-08-07 at 14:04 -0400, Doug Peterson wrote:
> That wiki page was helpful. In one set of cases the change was from
> highway=cycleway on the way to
Just to throw another curveball in here, there is also
leisure=nature_reserve which is frequently (occasionally?) used for the
city/county parks that are less structured and used for hiking and
nature appreciation.
On Sun, 2019-04-28 at 08:48 -0500, Aaron Forsythe wrote:
> On 4/26/2019 9:49 PM,
Would this fit the route relation model better if we used the following
tagging scheme
route:road
network:MD:hurricane
or something similar?
On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 23:06 +, Eric H. Christensen wrote:
> I recently finished an update to the evacuation routes feature[0],
> turning it into a
t; create one new task for both Durham and Chatham Counties, or one for
> each? Also, how many addresses should each section have?
> Thanks again,
> Leif
>
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2018, 2:39 PM James Umbanhowar
> wrote:
> > Sorry, I just saw this. Please do not upload this, yet
omething meaningful, like the front door of the building. Some have
> in the past gone so far to say that nodes are preferable since it
> allows routers for the differently abled to provide door-to-door
> guidance.
>
> -Nathan
>
>
> On July 21, 2018 2:39:36 PM EDT, James Umbanho
Sorry, I just saw this. Please do not upload this, yet. You have not
responded to any of the feedback that I have given. Instead you have
chosen to just upload all the points into the database and then correct
the database afterwards.
Please, instead, break this into smaller areas and then
I grew up in an area with these kinds of roads and I don't think
they're technically compacted. The gravel, which is crushed
limerstone, is laid down and due to its chemical properties creates a
smooth surface after several months of traffic.
I've used surface=gravel; gravel=crushed_limestone in
As a quick note, that is a PGS coastline converted to riverbank, so
don't blame the import happy Yanks for this one.
James
On Sun, 2017-01-15 at 23:55 +0100, Simon Poole wrote:
> While investigating a complaint to legal today in the vicinity of
> Denton
> Maryland, I couldn't help noticing that
I've noticed a bunch of editors (at least 5) adding single building
footprints in all over the country. Most of the edits have been good
albeit with minimal changeset comments (something I'm guilty of too).
One had the changeset titles "Added building footprint for Nighthawk
team".
Does
Funny, I just looked at the MapRoulette beta and noticed that you were
already doing this.
On Fri, 2016-06-03 at 10:00 -0400, James Umbanhowar wrote:
> Minor suggestion for this MapRoulette challenge: Could you structure
> it by state (or other geographic region, county?) and do each
Minor suggestion for this MapRoulette challenge: Could you structure
it by state (or other geographic region, county?) and do each region
sequentially. I, personally, think it would be neat to see areas get
"done" as far as Tiger clean up.
Either way, thanks for these.
James
On Fri,
Regardless of the community's eventual solution, I think the most
important part of this event was the lack of engagement of Caliparks
and Stamen with the community. Is there a similar process for
institutional (business, government, non-profit) editing of data as
there is for imports? There
I've used natural=woods for areas formerly in agriculture that were not
naturally growing in with trees. This seemed more appropriate than
forest as they are not really being managed for harvest.
I could go either way on the National Forest tagging issue. While
technically they are managed as
The GDMBR issue seems to be a conflict between tagging for the renderer
and tagging for the router ;). To play a little bit of devil's
advocate, gravel roads are eminently bikeable to many non-mountain
bikes. Bike manufacturers have come out with gravel grinder style
bikes which are really just
On Thu, 2014-05-08 at 05:58 -0400, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
The problem (aside from the issue of data clutter) is that the
sidewalk data can't be used for pedestrian routing because the
information about the street is not captured. You can't tell someone
to follow Main Street, because the path
Hi Kristen,
I was able to get it to work. I used North Carolina and use the WMS
link from the NC page:
http://gis.apfo.usda.gov/arcgis/services/NAIP/North_Carolina_2012_1m_NC/ImageServer/WMSServer?request=GetCapabilitiesservice=WMS
In the WMS/TMS part of JOSM preferences I added a new WMS
According to http://www.ncgicc.com/Default.aspx?tabid=135 and links
therein, they are doing 1/4 of the state per year on a rolling basis.
This year they photographed the eastern Piedmont and are currently
getting it ready for release, probably in early 2014. In 2014 they are
photographing
On Sun, 2013-11-10 at 18:26 -0600, John F. Eldredge wrote:
We probably need a value such as railway=inactive for routes that are
not in use, but still have the rails in place. The only problem is
that, if someone erroneously tags an active but little-used route as
inactive, this could lead
A discussion has arisen regarding the proper tagging of this bicycle route. I
thought it would be interesting to get some input from the community. The
East Coast Greenway is a bike route that has been developed by the private
nonprofit East Coast Greenway Alliance. The Greenway is a
This is really cool. I have a few comments and questions about how this
will work, but I think this will be a great way to import the NHD.
1. Can you edit points and locations before you approve a feature?
This would be nice for both inaccurately located points, but also for
integrating with
On Sun, 2012-10-28 at 20:51 -0700, Paul Norman wrote:
Background: I'm working on converting NHD to .osm format
NHD is an extremely large data set. It's about 25G of zipfiles and all of
this converted to .osm would total about 3 TB. This is about 10x-15x times
the size of planet.osm.
On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 15:25 -0600, Martijn van Exel wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Ivan Komarov jkoma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
If one road ends near another road, that might actually be for a reason,
and
what
I was just traveling and was reminded of a Tiger problem that still hasn't
been solved throughout the US-- the county line connectivity issue. It seems
like a good problem for remapatron-- it is relatively discrete, but it also
gives mappers the opportunity to do some additional improvement of
If you are using JOSM and have the Tiger 2011 or 2012 data, for a
neighborhood this small it is easier to do it manually.
I just did it in about 3-4 minutes.
james
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 16:51 -0700, Alan Millar wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=32.29183lon=-95.4831zoom=17
I apologize to Richard if he assumed that we all knew about this, but I assume
the multiple borders refere to this:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machias_Seal_Island
On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 09:59:25 AM Metcalf, Calvin (DOT) wrote:
I was thinking something more along the lines of a
On Sun, 2012-07-22 at 18:33 -0700, Paul Norman wrote:
The main weakness with NHD data that I find is that there is no way to
distinguish between an OSM waterway=stream and waterway=river
Why not use the name?
___
Talk-us mailing list
On Thursday, July 19, 2012 12:02:29 PM Toby Murray wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Charlotte Wolter
techl...@techlady.com wrote:
Everyone,
Having looked over the damage and deletions for the last hour, I
feel the redaction has left the LA map essentially unusable.
Check out the historic tag
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Historic). You could add
historic=school and maybe historic:name=School Name.
On Fri, 2012-07-13 at 14:40 -0400, Kevin Kenny wrote:
As I've mentioned in the past, I have some personal mapping projects
that use OSM data.
One
I have just had a correspondence with another mapper who was remapping
Lake Mead shorelines to match new imagery. Due to a multi-year drought,
Lake Mead and other reservoirs in the west have had significantly
declining water levels. However, the lake levels could increase
dramatically if there
On Saturday, May 05, 2012 10:19:36 PM Paul Norman wrote:
I've been looking at the NHD data from the USGS site and have noticed a few
recent changes from how they were described on the wiki.
1. The viewer has changed. http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/nhd.html
will bring up a map you can
On Tuesday, April 10, 2012 09:46:00 AM Peter Dobratz wrote:
I'm experimenting with the Java code from Traveling Salesman
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Traveling_salesman
I'm making library calls to the routing code and it seems that the
router does not understand cul-de-sacs mapped as
On Tuesday, April 03, 2012 08:17:16 AM Phil! Gold wrote:
* Minh Nguyen m...@1ec5.org [2012-04-03 02:19 -0700]:
I'd prefer to see the shields strung out along the concurrency, with
no spacing between each shield. That would be especially helpful
where the concurrency's shields happen to
On Friday, September 30, 2011 07:51:39 AM Metcalf, Calvin (DOT) wrote:
I'm actually in the process of doing this for MA and was trying to figure
out the correct tagging, I take it in the US we don't use the local
regional national bike route scheme?
As far as I can tell, there seems to be a
://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_United_States_Long_Distance_Trails
-Original Message-
From: James Umbanhowar [mailto:jumba...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 8:44 AM
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] East Coast Greenway
On Friday, September 30, 2011 07:51:39 AM
Hi Ben (and others),
Sorry I haven't commented on the conversion until now. Life intervened. In
general the conversion looks good. One slightly important thing I noticed is
that there are no names on any of the objects.
James
On Friday, August 26, 2011 12:14:44 AM Ben Supnik wrote:
Hi Ben,
On Wednesday, June 29, 2011 03:05:26 PM Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 6/29/2011 2:49 PM, Nathan Mills wrote:
My personal preference is to use directional roles so that they match
what is written on signage. It also avoids the inevitable which way is
forward and which is backward question.
AM Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 6/10/2011 10:46 PM, James Umbanhowar wrote:
The website says all data is free for use
(http://www.nconemap.com/Default.aspx?tabid=286) and any queries will not
be answered. A close reading leaves some slight ambiguity Geospatial
content provided directly from
The state of North Carolina has released 6 inch resolution orthoimagery for
the entire state that was taken during leaf off time in 2010. These are great
quality for all types of mapping. The information about the service is at:
On Friday, June 10, 2011 10:16:22 PM Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 6/10/2011 5:31 PM, James Umbanhowar wrote:
The state of North Carolina has released 6 inch resolution orthoimagery
for the entire state that was taken during leaf off time in 2010. These
are great quality for all types
Hi James,
I did some more corrections on the rules files and I think that it
covers all the left over points I saw (including adding
waterway:stream to one of FCODE for Connectors that wasn't working).
Just to confirm, these changes are the ones I see on the wiki, right?
Yes
In
On Thursday 28 April 2011 08:53:56 Ben Supnik wrote:
Hi Ian,
I should be able to convert the NHD data sometime in the next week or
so. Also, if/when you want the original data, let me know.
For the conversion, do we want medium or high resolution?
Re: the import status map, I don't
On Tuesday 26 April 2011 12:50:41 Ben Supnik wrote:
Hi Y'all,
From what I can tell:
- Every water body does get a reach ID. I've seen nulls in this file
but haven't yet figured out what they are...in local sample areas, all
water bodies have reach IDs.
- If there is linkeage between
On Sunday, April 03, 2011 08:53:50 am Richard Weait wrote:
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 7:57 AM, James U jumba...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, April 03, 2011 07:45:50 am Mike N wrote:
On 4/2/2011 11:37 PM, Val Kartchner wrote:
Within the past few days I discovered an area built up for public use
Officially, there are the Census Metropolitan Statistical Areas, which are
roughly equivalent to many of the colloquially used metro areas. These are
not administrative regions, although some may coincide with some
administrative regions. I do think it would be valuable to somehow tag these
You can find a lot of data at the nps web site:
http://nrinfo.nps.gov/Home.mvc
I did a quick check and saw trail map data sets for 3 out of 3 parks:
Acadia, Great Smoky and Grand Canyon. I didn't check what format or
quality or anything else about them.
James
On Tuesday, February 15, 2011
On Thursday 23 September 2010 15:07:51 Steven Johnson wrote:
Hello list,
Just want to make everyone aware of an upcoming two-day mapping party in
Raleigh/Cary/Research Triangle (NC) next weekend (2 - 3 October). If you're
in the area, please bring your GPS (or Walking Papers) and come out!
Does anyone know why the area around around Raton, NM looks like it is
melting? I don't think it even renders in Osmarender.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=36.93134lon=-104.46384zoom=16layers=B000FTF
___
Talk-us mailing list
Thanks, I reverted them back to their last known address-- much closer to
Santa Fe than Santa Claus.
James
(resending to list)
On Monday 14 December 2009 12:21:07 pm you wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 09:18 -0800, Dave Hansen wrote:
On Mon, 2009-12-14 at 12:07 -0500, James Umbanhowar wrote
53 matches
Mail list logo
