Re: [Talk-us] Chicago Buildings Redux

2013-03-04 Thread Ian Dees
Hi imports, A couple weeks ago I sent this message about Chicago releasing some of their data with an MIT license. Now that it's out and I've had some time to work with it, I'd like to propose continuing the import of buildings in Chicago. As I mentioned, I already successfully imported roughly

Re: [Talk-us] Chicago Buildings Redux

2013-03-04 Thread Jason Remillard
Hi Ian, - The changeset source tag, shouldn't that be something like - City of Chicago, data set blablabla. The github link will probably be dead in 5 years. You could use a website= tag on the change set for the github repo link. - The wiki says that you are planning on manually checking for

Re: [Talk-us] Chicago Buildings Redux

2013-03-04 Thread Ian Dees
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Jason Remillard remillard.ja...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Ian, - The changeset source tag, shouldn't that be something like - City of Chicago, data set blablabla. The github link will probably be dead in 5 years. You could use a website= tag on the change set for the

Re: [Talk-us] Chicago Buildings Redux

2013-03-04 Thread Jason Remillard
Hi Ian, One more thing. I realize that this is a controversial area. On our import MA building import we decided to not include the MassGIS building id. The id was just a munged centroid position and MassGIS indicated they don't intend for it to be preserved/maintained long term. Basically, the

Re: [Talk-us] Chicago Buildings Redux

2013-03-04 Thread Ian Dees
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 5:32 PM, Jason Remillard remillard.ja...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Ian, One more thing. I realize that this is a controversial area. On our import MA building import we decided to not include the MassGIS building id. The id was just a munged centroid position and MassGIS

Re: [Talk-us] Chicago Buildings Redux

2013-02-21 Thread Alex Barth
Awesome. NYC used to have the same retraction clause, luckily sane forces did away with it there, too. Bit by bit US city governments are outrunning OSM in openness :) On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 11:23 PM, Skye Book skye.b...@gmail.com wrote: That is incredibly encouraging news, congrats on the

[Talk-us] Chicago Buildings Redux

2013-02-20 Thread Ian Dees
Hi imports, Earlier last year I downloaded the Chicago building footprints shapefile [0] from the Chicago data portal, chopped it into manageable bits and started importing it into OSM. Halfway through the process of merging and uploading this data I read the data portal's license [1] closer,