At 2012-04-16 20:41, Toby Murray wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/16/2012 9:18 PM, Alan Mintz wrote:
At 2012-04-16 14:06, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Or you can simply add odbl=clean if there's nothing ungood about the
object (e.g. it was
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Alan Mintz
alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net wrote:
At 2012-04-16 20:41, Toby Murray wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 4/16/2012 9:18 PM, Alan Mintz wrote:
At 2012-04-16 14:06, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Or you
Sure, Alan. I'll try to help by explaining a core of my process,
and you and others can take it from there.
Great job - thanks for this. I'm sure it helps.
Appreciate the kudos. We might all share like this when asked. This
is called a workflow and workflows with specific numbered steps
At 2012-04-16 13:24, stevea wrote:
At 2012-04-12 17:36, you wrote:
I see excellent progress in California during the recent eight days of
re-mapping. If you are an editing maniac...
Can you comment on your process? I see very little real, coordinated info
about tools, concrete solutions, or
At 2012-04-16 13:52, stevea wrote:
At 2012-04-12 17:36, you wrote:
I see excellent progress in California during the recent eight days of
re-mapping. If you are an editing maniac...
Can you comment on your process? I see very little real, coordinated info
about tools, concrete solutions, or
On 4/16/2012 8:56 PM, Alan Mintz wrote:
So, we're basically duplicating the existing way and then blessing it.
Is this really sufficient - to verify the tainted geometry instead of
re-drawing it?
Only if the nodes are clean.
Another point, at least in SoCal, is that many of our tainted ways
At 2012-04-16 14:06, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Or you can simply add odbl=clean if there's nothing ungood about the
object (e.g. it was split from a TIGER way and the splitting is something
you would have done anyway).
Is this really sufficient? Can someone from the redaction squad comment?
On 4/16/2012 9:18 PM, Alan Mintz wrote:
At 2012-04-16 14:06, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Or you can simply add odbl=clean if there's nothing ungood about the
object (e.g. it was split from a TIGER way and the splitting is
something you would have done anyway).
Is this really sufficient? Can
From: Alan Mintz [mailto:alan_mintz+...@earthlink.net]
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2012 6:18 PM
To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Excellent progress, u.s.
At 2012-04-16 14:06, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Or you can simply add odbl=clean if there's nothing ungood about
I just saw this post on the rebuild list, so you guys might want to be a tad
careful when you're doing cleaning work by creating a new way and keeping the
old tainted nodes in it.
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/rebuild/2012-April/000206.html
On 4/16/2012 11:04 PM, James Mast wrote:
I just saw this post on the rebuild list, so you guys might want to be a
tad careful when you're doing cleaning work by creating a new way and
keeping the old tainted nodes in it.
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/rebuild/2012-April/000206.html
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/16/2012 9:18 PM, Alan Mintz wrote:
At 2012-04-16 14:06, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
Or you can simply add odbl=clean if there's nothing ungood about the
object (e.g. it was split from a TIGER way and the splitting
On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 7:26 PM, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 April 2012 03:30, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
One drawback to this new-coordinate technique is that, in some
cases, the tainted nodes will have been
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 9:30 PM, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
One drawback to this new-coordinate technique is that, in some cases, the
tainted nodes will have been in the proper locations to match the real world.
Probably not. Every source we rely upon is wrong in one way or
On Apr 13, 2012 6:31 PM, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
One drawback to this new-coordinate technique is that, in some cases, the
tainted nodes will have been in the proper locations to match the real
world. So, in order to make the cleanup bot not consider the nodes to be
tainted,
On 14 April 2012 03:30, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
One drawback to this new-coordinate technique is that, in some cases, the
tainted nodes will have been in the proper locations to match the real world.
So, in order to make the cleanup bot not consider the nodes to be
andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 April 2012 03:30, John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com wrote:
One drawback to this new-coordinate technique is that, in some
cases, the tainted nodes will have been in the proper locations to
match the real world. So, in order to make the
On 4/12/2012 11:13 PM, James Mast wrote:
It seems that they are just starting a new way and connecting each
old node to the new way without at least moving the old node, which
means if Lar created the node and nobody has moved it since, it still
will get deleted and mess up the highway
I don't know who's doing that work in Columbia on the Interstates,
but they are doing it wrong unfortunately. While the ways aren't
tainted anymore, all of the nodes are still. Meaning that once
the bot gets unleashed, the highways will still get fucked-up. It
seems that they are just
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:27 AM, stevea stevea...@softworkers.com wrote:
I don't know who's doing that work in Columbia on the Interstates, but
they are doing it wrong unfortunately. While the ways aren't tainted
anymore, all of the nodes are still. Meaning that once the bot gets
unleashed,
Agreed. I am spending some cozy times with I65 in Alabama, next on my list
is US 78. Better late than never. Cleaning up lots of bridge trouble too
(missing grade separations).
For those interested, I identified ~12000 points of highway Trouble for the
US (here is the blog post -
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Toby Murray toby.mur...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:27 AM, stevea stevea...@softworkers.com
wrote:
I don't know who's doing that work in Columbia on the Interstates, but
they are doing it wrong unfortunately. While the ways aren't tainted
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us wrote:
I've been working in Seattle. An undecided (and probably long gone) mapper
touched a large segment of the area. Looking at CLEANMAP, Seattle looks
much better after hours of work by many people. However if every
Well guys, as far as I know, as long as the non-CT user didn't add any tags to
the node, all you have to do is move said node to a new coordinate and it
should then be considered un-tainted. That's what I was told and that's what
happens on the OSM Inspector. Plus, if you're using the
James Mast rickmastfa...@hotmail.com wrote:
Well guys, as far as I know, as long as the non-CT user didn't add any
tags to the node, all you have to do is move said node to a new
coordinate and it should then be considered un-tainted. That's what I
was told and that's what happens on the
Hey, us, vaguely northamerican OSMers: nice work so far!
I see excellent progress in California during the recent eight days
of re-mapping. If you are an editing maniac (like me in the last few
days) you have discovered that BADMAP lag makes you move onto another
region. I have chased
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:36 PM, stevea stevea...@softworkers.com wrote:
Hey, us, vaguely northamerican OSMers: nice work so far!
I see excellent progress in California during the recent eight days of
re-mapping. If you are an editing maniac (like me in the last few days) you
have
Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 21:56:49 -0500
From: toby.mur...@gmail.com
To: stevea...@softworkers.com
CC: talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Excellent progress, u.s.
I have noticed several people's remapping efforts in my live edit
viewer. Over towards the east, I see long
28 matches
Mail list logo
