[Talk-us] Gov't/military firing ranges --- not sport

2010-05-08 Thread David Carmean
I'm reluctant to tag civil/military gov't firing ranges as sport. I'd consider them more as hazardous areas to mark/avoid, but I don't know how to tag them as such. Ideas? ___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-us] Gov't/military firing ranges --- not sport

2010-05-08 Thread Richard Welty
On 5/8/10 9:40 AM, David Carmean wrote: I'm reluctant to tag civil/military gov't firing ranges as sport. I'd consider them more as hazardous areas to mark/avoid, but I don't know how to tag them as such. Ideas? landuse=military military=danger_area and landuse=military

Re: [Talk-us] Gov't/military firing ranges --- not sport

2010-05-08 Thread Dale Puch
I think I see your concern. I think Military should be tagged as Richard suggested, and the civilian ranges, including police should still be sport:shooting both per the wiki. Police use public ranges sometiems (or are open to public use) and if not they are reasonable contained and controlled to

Re: [Talk-us] Gov't/military firing ranges --- not sport

2010-05-08 Thread Richard Welty
On 5/8/10 1:16 PM, David Carmean wrote: On Sat, May 08, 2010 at 10:39:37AM -0400, Richard Welty wrote: i should think you would use danger_area even for inactive ranges, due to the potential for unexploded munitions. Ah, ok; I think I made my question too generic; I actually want