Mike,
Thanks for doing this! It sounds like a much bigger ordeal than I had
originally thought.
--
Jim
On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 8:47 AM, Mike Thompson miketh...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
Since no objection to removing natural=water from the Lake Superior
relation has been expressed, I have
AJ,
Thanks for your message and your interest in this topic.
I have been reluctant to remove the natural=water tag from the relation (I
am not the one that added it). I was worried that it might have widespread
unintended consequences. However, given your and maxerickson's suggestion,
I say we
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Mike Thompson miketh...@gmail.com wrote:
User maxerickson sent me this comment directly about this issue:
=
The current modeling of the Great Lakes is actually to use
natural=coastline.
The addition of natural=water to the lake
Jim,
So far no tags have been changed, I only made sure that no natural=wetlands
extended into Lake Superior from Isle Royale. I will work on the
relation aspect later.
Mike
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Jim McAndrew j...@loc8.us wrote:
Mike,
Thanks for looking into it! I'll look at how
Jim,
Isle Royale should be rendering correctly at all zoom levels. I added the
ways that make up the island to the Lake Superior multipolygon relation as
inner members *and* removed the natural=coastline tag from those same
ways. According to the wiki [1], this is the current method for mapping
User maxerickson sent me this comment directly about this issue:
=
The current modeling of the Great Lakes is actually to use
natural=coastline.
The addition of natural=water to the lake superior relation is probably
what caused the bad rendering at z13.
If you check the
Jim,
Are you referring to how Isle Royale spills into Lake Superior? Might it
be a broken relation rather than a tagging issue?
Mike
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Jim McAndrew j...@loc8.us wrote:
I've been noticing some weird tile issues around the Great Lakes.
What is the best way to
Mike,
That's the issue! I know there's some weird stuff going on with the great
lakes either being coastlines or giant lakes. I don't have any experience
working on something that large in OSM. We are using OSM data for an NPS
map, and Isle Royale is a NPS unit, so I'd like to try to get it to
Jim,
It seems to be missing a natural=coastline tag. I assuming we are treating
islands in the Great Lakes like islands in the sea. Could someone confirm?
I also noticed that part of a natural=wetland polygon is in the lake.
Mike
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 1:18 PM, Jim McAndrew j...@loc8.us
I assume that should be natural=verywetland, yes?
Yes! - Good one!
Jim,
I fixed the wetlands that extended into Lake Superior. The problem you
pointed out seems to have gone away. However, Above zoom level 12 Isle
Royale is flooded by the lake. This is true of other islands within Lake
10 matches
Mail list logo
