Bill Ricker bill.n1...@gmail.com writes:
not having to reverse engineer the map since the TIGER was available
(and other sources are coming available some faster some slower Eg,
MASS was loaded from state data not Tiger) results in much more
'studio' work (fixing TIGER overpasses to pass
Val Kartchner val...@gmail.com writes:
On Sat, 2010-06-26 at 06:51 -0400, Greg Troxel wrote:
This is true for roads, but TIGER/massgis did not have hiking trails.
Around Boston there are starting to be a lot of trails mapped - I keep
noticing improvements by others. Plus there's parking
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 8:56 AM, McGuire, Matthew
matt.mcgu...@metc.state.mn.us wrote:
It would be fun to see the relative state to state activity and, of course,
compare it to international activity
not having to reverse engineer the map since the TIGER was available (and
other sources
it to international activity.
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Apollinaris Schoell [mailto:ascho...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 11:23 PM
To: Dave Hansen
Cc: Richard Weait; McGuire, Matthew; talk-us@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Percentage of data imported vs mapped
In Oregon, 48
Does anyone know the percentage of OSM data that is imported vs mapped in the
US? How does this compare to other countries?
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:42 AM, McGuire, Matthew
matt.mcgu...@metc.state.mn.us wrote:
Does anyone know the percentage of OSM data that is imported vs mapped in
the US? How does this compare to other countries?
When TIGER was imported it dominated the database and contributed data
from all
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 12:05 -0400, Richard Weait wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:42 AM, McGuire, Matthew
matt.mcgu...@metc.state.mn.us wrote:
Does anyone know the percentage of OSM data that is imported vs mapped in
the US? How does this compare to other countries?
When TIGER was
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 12:05 -0400, Richard Weait wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:42 AM, McGuire, Matthew
matt.mcgu...@metc.state.mn.us wrote:
Does anyone know the percentage of OSM data that is imported vs mapped
in
On 23 June 2010 18:12, Dave Hansen d...@sr71.net wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 12:05 -0400, Richard Weait wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:42 AM, McGuire, Matthew
matt.mcgu...@metc.state.mn.us wrote:
Does anyone know the percentage of OSM data that is imported vs mapped in
the US? How does
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:42 AM, McGuire, Matthew
matt.mcgu...@metc.state.mn.us wrote:
Does anyone know the percentage of OSM data that is imported vs mapped in
the US? How does this compare to other countries?
That's a hard question to answer. The easiest thing[1] would be to
check the
Using the same command on CloudMade's pennsylvania.osm, I get
1092728/1685382, i.e. 65%.
—Sven
On 23-Jun-10, at 12:12 , Dave Hansen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 12:05 -0400, Richard Weait wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:42 AM, McGuire, Matthew
matt.mcgu...@metc.state.mn.us wrote:
Does
In Oregon, 48% of the objects have been most recently modified by
non-TIGER sources. Calculated this way:
grep -o 'user=[a-zA-Z0-9]*' oregon.osm | sort | uniq -c | sort -n | grep
-vi tiger | awk '{sum += $1} END { print sum;}'
grep -o 'user=[a-zA-Z0-9]*' oregon.osm | sort | uniq -c | sort
12 matches
Mail list logo
